What does outsourcing your recruitment look like?

RESOURCEBy Rullion on 06 January 2025

Many organisations recognise the benefits of outsourcing their recruitment. From cost savings and efficiencies, to greater transparency throughout the hiring process, access to the latest recruitment technologies, reduction of risk and increased awareness of your brand through an enhanced candidate experience.

However, it can be overwhelming knowing where to start. We have developed a toolkit to guide organisations through the outsourcing process, from the initial idea of why you should outsource your recruitment, right through to implementing a model. 

There are a myriad of factors that need to be taken into account and crucial decisions to be made about the different type of recruitment partnership which will benefit your organisation the most. The model you decide to implement will need to be the best solution for your requirements, both now and in the medium term, taking into account expansion plans, hard-to-fill positions, economic conditions and more.

We’ve outlined some of the standard recruitment models, so you have all the knowledge you need to select the right model for your organisation, and you can start to visualize what outsourcing your recruitment actually looks like.

Master Vendor

 A Master Vendor recruitment partner aims to fill at least 90% of all requirements. Any positions unable to be filled by the Master Vendor are released to a second tier of suppliers, managed by the Master Vendor.  The Master Vendor is also responsible for additional services such as inductions, bespoke invoicing arrangements, temporary staff care and legal compliance, with recruitment technology often incorporated as part of the service.

A Master Vendor recruitment partner is most effective in situations where you have a high concentration of one type of worker, for example, a large proportion of IT contract workers.

Recruitment

Master Vendor Pros

  • A single point of contact for all recruitment requirements, one contractual agreement and a single invoice streamlines the process and increases transparency.
  • Significant cost reductions are common with this model via improved agency fees, control over pay rates, quality of candidate shortlist, and improved invoicing processes.
  • Reduced time to hire and improved quality of candidate owing to the dedicated account team and improved hiring manager experience.

 Master Vendor Cons

  • High quality second tier supplier may not be motivated due to limited volumes/opportunities.
  • Other disciplines outside of the Master Vendor are often filled on an ad-hoc basis by multiple suppliers who may not abide by the standards or commercial requirements of the programme.
  • The Master Vendor status may lead to complacency if KPIs are not regularly measured, monitored and reviewed.

Managed Service Partnership (MSP)

An MSP aims to fill at least 60% of all requirements, using a tight work network of preferred suppliers to support their recruitment activity. The most effective partnerships involve on-site coordination, control and reporting on all recruitment activity on your behalf. These partnerships also include searching, screening, interviewing, shortlisting and managing contractors, and often include technology and tailored solutions are part of the offering.

An MSP is ideal when your organisation has a large portion of contingent workers.

Recruitment

MSP Pros

  • The recruitment partner is responsible and accountable for 100% fulfillment of all requirements to agreed quality and timescales, and the finds the best candidate for the job, regardless of the source.
  • This partnership results in significant cost reductions via improved agency fees, control over pay rates, quality of candidate shortlist and improved invoicing processes.
  • An on-site team will integrate into your business, resulting in improved quality of candidates that fit your organisation’s culture.

MSP Cons

  • The recruitment partner may not engage appropriately or fairly with its supply partners, given an inherent desire to fill the maximum number of roles themselves.
  • An MSP may lead to complacency if the KPIs are not regularly measured, monitored and reviewed.

Neutral Vendor

A Neutral Vendor is slightly different to the other models. Requirements are not filled by the recruitment partner directly, but by a large network of preferred suppliers managed by the recruitment partner. Thus, your Neutral Vendor recruitment partner suppliers’ will fill 100% of requirements. If the recruitment partner is part of a larger staffing group, you can also request those brands cannot supply workers, making the programme, by definition, strictly neutral.

A Neutral Vendor partnership can involve on-site coordination, control and reporting on all recruitment activity on your behalf. Recruitment technology and automated processes are at the heart of most successful neutral vendor partnerships.

This model is most effective in relation to large volume recruitment, typically over 800 workers, where the emphasis is on volume sourcing, time to hire pressures and efficient, scalable processes.

Recruitment

Neutral Vendor Pros

  • The recruitment partner is acting solely with the intention of finding the best candidate, regardless of the source.
  • As the recruitment partner doesn’t have a supply capability of its own in this agreement, the neutral vendor manages your supply chain impartially.
  • There’s a significant reduction in overall recruitment costs through streamlined processes and rationalised agency fees.

Neutral Vendor Cons

  • This model is often criticised for not cultivating warm relations with agency suppliers, leading to a disengaged supply chain which ultimately impacts the quality of service to you.
  • Representing and safeguarding your brand in the candidate marketplace is not controlled by the recruitment partner, risking your brand.

Ultimately, it is important that you weigh up both the pros and cons of each model in order to ensure you select the most effective outsourcing model. For a complete guide on outsourcing your recruitment, download our ‘How to Outsource Your Contingent Recruitment’ toolkit.

Share

More like this

RESOURCE
Background Screening Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Right BPSS Partner

Background Screening Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Right BPSS Partner

Background screening decisions are often made quickly and under pressure. In critical infrastructure environments, those decisions now carry delivery risk not just compliance responsibility. This buyer’s guide helps organisations understand how background screening services are actually delivered in practice, and how to choose a BPSS partner that supports mobilisation, not delays it. Understanding the Real Differences Between BPSS Providers BPSS clearance may look standardised on paper, but outcomes vary widely depending on the provider’s delivery model. Delays, incomplete files and unexpected internal workload often sit behind low-rate cards, disrupting start dates and placing additional strain on HR and delivery teams. This buyer’s guide is designed for business leaders, HR managers and department heads operating across regulated and safety-critical environments. It provides a practical framework for evaluating pre-employment screening providers beyond headline pricing, with a specific focus on BPSS clearance and associated checks such as the Right to Work check. Inside the guide, you’ll find: Why BPSS prices vary and why rate cards rarely tell the full story. The difference between transactional screening and complex BPSS clearance. Where hidden delays and internal workload typically arise. How different delivery models affect candidate experience and mobilisation. Five diagnostic questions to help assess how a screening provider really works. Written simply and designed for practical decision-making, this buyer’s guide supports stronger internal conversations, more confident supplier evaluation and better outcomes from background screening services.

By Rullion on 20 January 2026

How do you know when it’s time to change jobs?

How do you know when it’s time to change jobs?

For many people out there, there’s something about January that makes work feel harder than it should. The energy dips, the weather doesn’t help, and suddenly the Sunday scaries feel louder than usual. With Blue Monday landing in the middle of the month, it’s easy to blame the calendar. But if that dread has been building for a while, it might not be the day at all. It might be the realisation that you’ve fallen out of love with your job. Is Blue Monday real? Blue Monday is often described as the most depressing day of the year, usually falling in mid-to-late January. It isn’t officially backed by science, but it’s become a cultural shorthand for something many people genuinely experience: low motivation and mood, and a sense that work is harder to face than usual. And that’s the important part. Regardless if the label is real or not, the feelings can be. If you’ve been feeling like that lately, it’s worth asking a slightly different question: is it Blue Monday, or have you fallen out of love with your job? Dealing with Sunday scaries (and why they’re worth paying attention to) Not every Monday needs to feel exciting. But when the thought of the week ahead leaves you with the Sunday scaries and consistently brings tension or unease, it’s worth paying attention to what that feeling is trying to tell you. It can look like: Your mood dipping halfway through Sunday A tight chest feeling when you think about your inbox Being snappy, restless, or distracted at home Struggling to sleep because your brain won’t switch off Feeling like you’re already behind before the week has started The Sunday scaries aren’t always a sign you need to quit your job, and experiencing any of these doesn’t mean something is “wrong” with you. It means something in your working life may need attention. Recognising that is often the first step towards positive change. How to know when you need a new job If January has made you feel a little more flat than usual, it can be difficult to tell what’s temporary and what’s deeper. But there are some clear signs that go beyond a rough start to the year. Signs that it might be time to take your feelings seriously. Wanting change doesn’t mean you’re ungrateful or impatient. Often, it means you’ve outgrown something that once fit. 1) You’re tired in a way sleep doesn’t fix If you’re constantly drained, even after rest, it can be a sign your job is taking more energy than it gives back. 2) Your confidence has taken a hit You second-guess yourself more. You feel behind and that you’re “not as good as you used to be.” That’s often less about your ability and more about the environment you’re in. 3) You’re bored, stuck, or quietly disengaged Not every job needs to feel exciting every day, but if you’re no longer learning and growing or being challenged, it can start to feel pointless. 4) You’re always waiting for things to improve You’re holding out for a restructure, a new manager, a calmer workload, a better quarter. But months pass and nothing really changes. 5) You’re doing the work, but you don’t care anymore This one is easy to miss because you can still be performing well. But when you’ve emotionally checked out, it’s hard to stay in a role long-term without it affecting your wellbeing. 6) You feel like you’re shrinking to fit the job Your spark has gone, you’re quieter than you used to be, and you feel less confident and energised. Less “you”. That’s a signal, not a personality change. 7) You dread specific parts of the week (and it’s predictable) If your anxiety spikes before certain meetings, certain people, or certain days, it’s worth asking why. 8) You can’t picture yourself there in a year This is one of the clearest indicators. If thinking about staying fills you with dread or resignation, it’s often a sign that you already know more than you’re giving yourself credit for. If you’re nodding along, you might already have your answer to “how do I know if I need a new job?” Often, it’s when staying feels heavier than leaving. Should you try to fix your current job or is it time to move on? This is where people tend to get stuck. Because leaving isn’t always the answer. But staying and hoping things improve without changing anything rarely works either. A good way to look at it is this: if the job is fixable, the problem is usually specific, and there’s a realistic path to making it better. It might be a temporary rough patch if: A workload issue that can be reset (not just “this is how it is here”) A role that can be reshaped with clearer priorities A manager who listens and actually follows through A company that invests in your development A culture that’s generally healthy, even if you’re in a difficult season In other words, you still have influence. If you can make a few changes and feel noticeably better within a month or two, that’s a sign it may be worth trying to fix first. If it’s time to move on, the issue is usually structural. Better habits, increased resilience, or a longer weekend won't solve the problem. How do you know when it’s time to change jobs? If the issues are consistent and outside your control or affecting your wellbeing, it’s usually a sign it’s time to move on. You’ve raised concerns before and nothing changes The culture drains you, even when you’re performing well You don’t feel valued, trusted, or supported The expectations are unclear or constantly shifting Your growth has stalled and there’s no path forward You’re spending more time managing stress than doing meaningful work You don’t need your job to be perfect, but you do need it to be sustainable. Ask yourself: “Repairable” vs “Repeatable” – is this a one-off situation I can repair, or a repeating pattern I keep having to tolerate? What to do if you’re not ready to quit (but you know something needs to change)? Not everyone reading this is ready to hand in their notice, and that’s okay. Sometimes the first step isn’t leaving. It's getting clearer what your options are and what's going to be best for you in the long run. Here’s a simple way to approach this: 1) Pinpoint what’s actually causing the dread Is it the work itself? Is it the pace and pressure at work? A lack of career progression? Is leadership lacking or you need more support? Does the team dynamic need improvement? Are you feeling undervalued or underpaid? 2) Decide what “better” would look like Are you needing more flexibility? Are you seeking a clearer path? Better management? Or a different kind of role entirely? This matters because it helps to switch your mindset from feeling hopeless to moving towards something. Sometimes clarity comes from learning what else exists. Exploring how different industries work, or how skills transfer across sectors like rail, nuclear, or utilities, can help you understand what “better” might look like for you. 3) Try one change inside your current job That could be: A conversation about expectations A reset on workload and priorities Asking for development or progression planning Changing projects or responsibilities Setting firmer boundaries If you try to fix it and things genuinely improve, great. If you try to fix it and nothing changes, you've also learnt something valuable. You don’t have to stay stuck If Blue Monday has made you stop and think, that’s not a bad thing. Sometimes it’s the moment you realise you’ve been pushing through longer than you should. Whether you decide to improve things where you are or start exploring something new, the important part is knowing you have options, and you don’t have to figure it out on your own. If you’re starting to think about what else might be out there, it can help to understand how hiring works today. Especially if it’s been a while since you last looked. Knowing how CV screening works can remove a lot of unnecessary anxiety before you even take the first step.

By Rullion on 19 January 2026