Why nuclear waste disposal feels stuck despite advances in technology

PODCASTBy Rullion on 20 March 2026

Whenever the nuclear industry talks about introducing new reactor designs, new fuel technologies, expanding nuclear capacity, or accelerating deployment timelines, the conversation almost always returns to long-term nuclear waste disposal. For many outside the industry, it still remains the central hesitation point. 

Insights from Rullion’s Hot off the Grid series show that while engineering solutions have advanced significantly, regulatory frameworks and public understanding have moved more slowly.

Jump to:

 

How nuclear waste is managed in daily operations

Why don’t we shoot nuclear waste into the sun? Popular suggestions such as launching waste into space often surface in public debate yet carry far greater technical risk than geological containment on Earth. 

Across nuclear facilities, spent fuel is stored in dry cask systems designed for long-term nuclear waste storage containment. The dry cask facilities use thick steel and reinforced concrete containers designed to withstand long-term exposure including seismic events and extreme weather. These systems have been in continuous use across operating sites for many years, with performance monitored under routine plant conditions.

Rod Baltzer, whose career spans radioactive waste operations and now leadership as CEO at Deep Isolation, highlighted how close this infrastructure sits to everyday life. A large proportion of the U.S. population lives within roughly 50 miles of stored nuclear material, yet incidents linked to storage remain exceptionally rare.

The controls, monitoring regimes, and regulatory oversight surrounding these facilities are extensive. The industry does not treat waste casually and hasn’t for decades. 

Where misunderstanding persists is in how this material is imagined. The gap between industry practice and public perception is substantial. Popular culture still leans toward images of leaking barrels and glowing sludge, while the reality is closer to heavy-industry containment and continuous inspection.

This disconnect has shaped how the waste conversation unfolds in public and political spaces.


How regulatory structures slowed long-term nuclear waste disposal

Rani Franovich, Vice President of Regulatory Strategy at Deep Fission, experienced over thirty years inside the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  provides context for why disposal infrastructure has progressed more slowly than reactor operations.

Much of today’s nuclear waste regulations were written around large repository concepts developed decades ago. In the late 1990s, regulatory oversight for operating plants shifted toward risk-informed performance measures. That approach improved how safety was assessed in real-world conditions. However, licensing frameworks for major infrastructure remained anchored to prescriptive rules developed around earlier repository concepts.

  • Regulatory processes remain heavily prescriptive

  • Approvals move at timescales disconnected from modern engineering cycles

  • Innovation must fit rule sets written for earlier repository concepts

Watch the full episode 8 of Hot off the Grid, where Rani Franovich talks about why nuclear regulation needs to change.

Advanced containment approaches now exist, yet must follow pathways designed for large, mined repositories conceived decades ago. This regulatory lag is often what sits behind public frustration around how we dispose of nuclear waste permanently, even as modern engineering solutions become available.

The result is extended approval timelines even where technical performance is well understood.

How nuclear engineering approaches to disposal have changed

Early nuclear disposal strategies focused on large underground repositories built through extensive excavation and permanent tunnel systems. Advances in nuclear waste technology, particularly in directional drilling and geological isolation, now allow nuclear material to be placed deep within stable geological formations using narrow boreholes that extend horizontally through selected rock layers. Within the nuclear industry, permanent nuclear waste disposal is now widely understood to centre on deep geological isolation, where material is emplaced far below groundwater systems in stable rock formations rather than large engineered underground facilities.

Watch the full episode with Rod Baltzer where he explains how companies such as Deep Isolation apply drilling methods originally developed in oil and gas to emplace spent fuel far below groundwater systems with significantly reduced surface infrastructure.

A similar geological logic underpins reactor concepts being developed by Deep Fission, which integrate reactor placement directly within deep boreholes to leverage natural containment and thermal properties of rock formations. 

Although applied to different parts of the nuclear lifecycle, both approaches reflect a broader industry shift toward precision underground engineering rather than cavern-scale construction.

In our episode with Deep Fission’s CEO, Liz Muller, she discussed how these methods also change the economic profile of disposal, reducing build timelines and capital intensity compared with legacy repository designs. 

Deep Fission has since gone public, raised $80M in financing to accelerate commercialisation, and announced Parsons, Kansas as the site for its Reactor Pilot Project, further signalling how quickly these concepts are moving toward real-world deployment.

From both a technical and financial standpoint, disposal strategies have moved into a new phase of feasibility.

 

Why the word “waste” keeps the debate locked in place 

Jenifer Avellaneda, a senior engineer at Westinghouse Electric Company, regularly fields questions online about nuclear safety and fuel management. Almost all of them pivot on the same assumption: that nuclear material becomes an unusable hazard the moment it leaves a reactor.

During our conversation with Jenifer, she mentioned she often begins by clarifying that much of what is referred to as waste is spent fuel that still contains usable energy and can be reprocessed in advanced fuel cycles. Beyond that technical point, she notes how language shapes perception. 

Once something is categorised as waste, people instinctively assume it must be removed immediately, isolated forever and treated as uniquely risky. That perception persists even though nuclear waste is not particularly hazardous or difficult to manage relative to other toxic industrial wastes, and safe methods for final disposal are technically proven through decades of experience in geological storage research. 

Avellaneda’s experience reflects a broader challenge within the sector. Technical explanations often lose ground to emotionally charged language that predates modern storage and disposal methods.

 

Where the nuclear industry now stands on disposal

In the UK, nuclear waste disposal policy centres on the development of a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF), overseen by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. The UK’s approach combines long-term nuclear waste storage at existing sites with a structured, consent-based siting process for permanent deep geological disposal. While deliberately paced under established nuclear waste regulations, UK nuclear waste disposal is progressing through defined regulatory, geological assessment and community engagement stages rather than standing still.

Across operational experiences, regulatory insight and engineering development, several consistent themes emerge: 

  • Current storage systems perform reliably and are closely monitored

  • Deep geological isolation methods are technically achievable using current drilling technology

  • Deployment speed and cost have improved markedly

  • Risk assessment methods are conservative and continuously refined 

From a technical standpoint, nuclear waste is not an unsolved problem. This frequently leads to the broader question of “is nuclear waste disposal still a problem for the industry?” Technically, containment and isolation are increasingly well understood. The remaining barriers are largely regulatory adaptation and public confidence. 

The friction lies in:

  • Infrastructure approval processes

  • Regulatory frameworks built for legacy designs

  • Public confidence shaped by outdated narratives

  • Education barriers

What this means for nuclear’s expansion

Long-term disposal now shapes nuclear projects from the earliest planning stages through to licensing and financing. While modern containment methods offer faster and more practical pathways, regulatory frameworks continue to reflect earlier repository designs.  

This disconnect increasingly determines how quickly new nuclear infrastructure can move forward. From an engineering standpoint, permanent isolation is now technically achievable. The industry has already moved beyond the disposal concepts of the last century. The question is no longer whether permanent isolation is technically possible. It is how efficiently regulatory, engineering and public systems can move together.

 

Hot off the Grid

Rullion’s Hot off the Grid series brings these perspectives from in-depth discussions with professionals working directly in nuclear operations, regulation, and technology development. 

Nuclear waste management is only one of the topics explored in these conversations. If you’d like to hear more from the people referenced in this article, along with other voices across the nuclear ecosystem, you can explore the full series on YouTube.

Share

Delivering nuclear projects takes more than technology

At Rullion, we support organisations across the UK nuclear sector with specialist workforce solutions aligned to licensing timelines and major infrastructure delivery.

If you're building capability for your next phase of growth, speak to our team.

More like this

BLOG
Does Your Early Careers Strategy Hold Up Under Pressure?

Does Your Early Careers Strategy Hold Up Under Pressure?

Most early careers programmes are built to run. Fewer are built to respond. For organisations in nuclear, energy, water, utilities and rail, that distinction matters. A strong early careers strategy is not simply about filling entry-level roles. It is about building the skills base future projects will depend on. Across these critical infrastructure sectors, hiring is rarely straightforward. Talent pipelines take time to build, and role requirements can shift while a campaign is already live. When an early careers programme cannot adapt mid-campaign, the impact is not limited to one delayed hire or one missed intake. It can create capability gaps that take years to close. That is why agility matters. Not agility as speed for its own sake. Agility as the ability to make informed decisions when conditions change. It means reading the pipeline early enough to spot where candidates are dropping out, then adjusting the campaign before momentum is lost. Jump to: Why critical infrastructure hiring puts early careers strategy under pressure Employer branding affects how quickly your campaign can respond What responsiveness looks like inside the early careers pipeline Fixed supplier models can slow the decisions that matter Shared ownership gives the programme room to move What to ask before your next early careers campaign Why critical infrastructure hiring puts early careers strategy under pressure Early careers hiring in critical infrastructure rarely happens in neat, predictable conditions. Campaigns often have to move before every role specification is fully confirmed. Application volumes can be difficult to forecast, and stakeholder requirements may continue to evolve once activity is already underway. That creates a very different environment from a standard graduate campaign. These organisations are hiring into sectors with long-term workforce needs and specialist technical roles that graduates may not immediately understand. The work is essential, but the career paths are not always obvious from the outside. A graduate may understand the appeal of joining a major technology brand or consultancy much faster than they understand the breadth of opportunity inside a water utility, nuclear operator or rail infrastructure organisation. The pressure is rarely spread evenly across the campaign either. Early talent attraction may appear steady before assessment centres, offer stages, and hiring manager reviews create sudden spikes in activity. A programme planned around a consistent level of resource can quickly become stretched at the moments where pace and judgement matter most. For example: In nuclear early careers, hiring may need input from safety teams or site-based technical stakeholders before candidates can progress. In water utilities, regional hiring needs can make attraction more uneven, with some locations generating strong interest while others need more targeted support. Across critical infrastructure, those kinds of variables make a fixed campaign model difficult to rely on. The added challenge of building an early careers programme from scratch For organisations developing an early careers programme for the first time, those pressures arrive without the benefit of an established model. There may be no reliable historical volume data, no proven channel mix, and no clear benchmark for how candidates will move through the process. “That makes agility important from the beginning, not something that we add once the programme matures. The strategy needs enough structure to give the campaign direction but enough flexibility to respond when conditions change.” - Dan Crerand, Director of Talent & Skills Employer branding affects how quickly your campaign can respond Employer brand is often treated as a pre-campaign activity. Build the message, launch the campaign, and review performance at the end. Graduate employer brand has a direct effect on how much pressure an early careers programme has to absorb during the campaign. Organisations with strong graduate brand recognition arrive with a level of built-in momentum. Candidates already know who they are and understand the offer before the campaign reaches them. That recognition may come from campus activity, peer networks, or previous graduate recruitment campaigns. Employer branding for critical infrastructure organisations Many organisations in nuclear, water utilities, rail, energy and renewables do not have that same advantage at the graduate level. That does not mean the roles are less compelling. Often, the opposite is true. These sectors can offer graduates meaningful work with technical depth and visible impact. The challenge is that the proposition often needs more explanation. In graduate rail recruitment programmes, the range of roles available is often wider than candidates expect. Behind day-to-day operations of the railway sits a business that spans commercial, digital, engineering, project management, and sustainability roles. Across the energy sector, the employer brand challenge may be different again. Organisations need to show how graduate roles connect to grid resilience, decarbonisation, infrastructure investment, or the practical delivery of the energy transition, rather than relying on broad sustainability messaging. If the pipeline is not building in the right disciplines, locations or candidate groups, the early careers strategy has to respond while the campaign is still live. Before applications close, the team may need to change the message and redirect activity or remove friction from the application process. A campaign that only reviews employer branding strategy at the end will always be reacting too late. What responsiveness looks like inside the early careers pipeline Monitor the pipeline while there is still time to act A responsive early careers pipeline is monitored continuously. Not just at headline level, and not only at the point of attraction. The useful questions are more specific: Which disciplines are filling faster than expected? Which locations are under-supplied? Which candidate groups are entering the funnel but not progressing? Where is the process creating friction? Which stages are taking longer than planned? Where are hiring managers becoming a bottleneck? For early careers hiring in rail, energy, nuclear and water utilities, those questions need to be asked early enough to influence the outcome. Knowing there is a shortfall after the campaign closes may help the next intake. Knowing it mid-campaign can protect the current one. Track diversity through every stage Attraction data only tells part of the story; diversity needs the same level of attention. A diversity recruitment strategy has to track candidate movement through every stage of the funnel, from initial engagement through to final acceptance. If female candidates, for example, are entering the early careers pipeline but dropping before completion, that points to a specific issue in the process. It could be: Job description language Website content Assessment communications Confidence levels Perceived fit or the way the opportunity has been framed Dan shared insights from a recent nuclear early careers campaign: “A 13% drop-off among female candidates between initial engagement and completed application highlighted exactly this kind of issue. The value was not in the number alone. It was in seeing the pattern early enough to review what was happening and make a targeted adjustment.” Build in room to change the assessment process Assessment processes also need room to flex. AI-assisted applications are now creating new graduate recruitment challenges and pressures across these safety-critical sectors. Organisations across nuclear, rail, and energy are having to think carefully about how they verify candidate understanding without adding unnecessary friction or delay. This might mean: Introducing an additional screening stage Changing the weighting of an assessment Adapting interview guidance for hiring managers Whatever the response, the key issue is whether the early careers programme can absorb that change without derailing the timeline. A resilient early careers strategy does not assume the original process will remain perfect from launch to offer. It creates the conditions to adjust when the evidence says something needs to change. Fixed supplier models can slow the decisions that matter Where a programme partner is treated as a supplier delivering against a fixed brief, responsiveness becomes harder. A small adjustment can quickly become a request that rolls into the need for reviews and approvals. By the time action is agreed upon, the campaign may already have moved on.That creates decision latency at exactly the wrong moment. For critical infrastructure organisations, the timing matters because internal teams are already carrying significant pressure. Dan noted: “Early careers hiring often sits alongside workforce planning, operational demands, stakeholder management and longer-term skills priorities. If the working model adds handovers or pushes decisions through extra approval loops, the programme becomes slower at the exact moment it needs to respond.” Shared ownership gives the programme room to move A shared ownership model means that both the organisation and the programme partner are working from the same data. Funnel performance is visible, and diversity movement is reviewed at each stage. When risks appear, they are discussed while there is still time to act. Decisions are made jointly, with clear ownership of what happens next. It also means the partner absorbs operational complexity rather than passing it back to the internal team. When attraction needs to shift, the response can be shaped quickly: Assessment spikes can be resourced before they become a bottleneck. Candidate communications can be updated before an issue becomes embedded. Stakeholders receive recommendations based on live evidence rather than end-of-campaign analysis. This is particularly important for organisations investing in an early careers strategy for the first time or scaling an early careers programme across multiple business areas, regions, or technical disciplines. The working relationship has to support the speed of the campaign. Otherwise, even good insight becomes too slow to matter. What to ask before your next early careers campaign Before the next campaign launches, the most useful questions are not only about process, platforms or attraction channels. They are about how the programme will respond when conditions change. What happens if application volume is lower than expected? Who decides when the campaign needs to change? How quickly can messaging, targeting or assessment be adjusted? Where is diversity being tracked beyond attraction? What happens if candidate behaviour shifts mid-campaign? How much pressure can the internal team absorb before delivery starts to suffer? For organisations in nuclear, energy, water utilities, and rail, these questions matter because early careers hiring feeds directly into long-term workforce capability. The strategy needs to look strong before launch, but it also needs to hold up once the campaign is live.

By Rullion on 02 June 2026

BLOG
Exploring purpose-led water industry careers

Exploring purpose-led water industry careers

Careers in the water industry are not always the first place candidates look when they start thinking about purpose-led work. But they should be. There is a gap that sits quietly in the middle of many careers. The work pays the bills and the role is fine on paper. But somewhere underneath the routine, there is a question that does not quite go away: does any of this work actually matter? For a growing number of younger professionals, salary alone no longer drives their career decisions. For Gen Zs and millennials, meaningful work, work-life balance, and a sense of purpose now sit alongside pay as major factors in how they judge employers and career moves. And yet the sectors that get associated with purpose-led work remain a fairly short list: healthcare, education, the third sector, and renewables. The water industry rarely makes that list. And it should. If you are exploring water industry careers for the first time or reconsidering a sector you had already written off, it’s worth taking a second look. Jump to: What does having a purpose-led career actually mean? The utilities sector has a perception problem The climate case for choosing a water industry career Community impact you can actually see The innovation happening inside the water industry What roles exist in the water industry? How to start exploring a career in water What does having a purpose-led career actually mean? “A purpose-led career” has become a phrase that can stretch to cover almost anything, which means it is sometimes vague enough to risk meaning very little. But at its simplest, a purposeful career means your daily output connects to something beyond the business itself. Beyond a company's commercial objectives, there is a positive impact on wider communities and the natural world. Purpose lives inside any sector where the work is essential and the people doing it understand the difference their contribution makes. The water industry sits squarely in that. The question is why so few candidates are looking there. The water sector has a perception problem It would be dishonest to write about water industry careers without addressing the obvious. The sector has had a difficult few years in the public eye, from untreated sewage discharges and high-profile financial difficulties to criticism of executive pay, ageing infrastructure, and concerns about whether the system can keep pace with demand. These issues have formed how many people outside the sector see it. Here’s what doesn’t often make the headlines: The utilities sector is now being held to higher public standards than at any point in recent memory. The Water Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 gave Ofwat and the Environment Agency stronger enforcement powers, including the ability to block executive bonuses at underperforming companies. Within the rule’s first year of the operation, Ofwat blocked more than £4 million of executive bonuses. This supports the continued focus on transparency and accountability across the water industry. Then there is AMP8. The 2025 to 2030 asset management period represents the largest capital investment programme in the history of the English and Welsh water sector, with approximately £104 billion approved by Ofwat. The people being hired in the near future will help deliver and commission water infrastructure that communities will rely on for decades. Curious about what that means for hiring across the sector? Our Talent on Tap whitepaper dives into the workforce pressures the water industry is up against as AMP8 delivery continues to ramp up. The climate case for choosing a water industry career For candidates drawn to environmental work, the water industry offers something many sectors struggle to provide: a direct connection between daily work and climate outcomes. Water scarcity, flooding resilience, catchment health, and river restoration are active priorities inside water utilities jobs. Catchment scientists are helping restore rivers degraded over decades Environmental compliance engineers are reducing pollution incidents at source Sustainability leads are designing net zero pathways for energy-intensive treatment processes Hydrologists and engineers are delivering storm overflow remediation schemes Ecologists, planners, and landscape specialists focused on nature-based solutions such as wetlands, sustainable drainage, and restored floodplains What makes these careers meaningful is not just the environmental language around them. It is the fact that the outcomes are tangible: storm overflow schemes that reduce untreated discharges into rivers and coastal waters; wetlands and restored floodplains that help manage flooding and improve biodiversity; lower-carbon treatment processes; and infrastructure better equipped for a changing climate. Supporting this, most major utility companies have made net zero commitments, with programmes covering renewable energy generation at treatment works, fleet electrification, sustainable drainage design, and embodied carbon reduction across capital projects. Continuing to show real impact for wider communities. Community impact you can actually see The scale of essential services is difficult to match. Water utilities serve entire populations. It creates a particular kind of professional responsibility that is difficult to replicate elsewhere. These programmes exist across the full breadth of the utilities sector, in urban and rural settings throughout England, Wales, and Scotland. A treatment operations team monitoring water quality through the night so that millions of people can turn on a tap in the morning without thinking about it A network planning team working to ensure pressure holds across a distribution system during a summer heatwave A community engagement lead explaining a storm overflow improvement programme to residents who have watched their local river deteriorate for years While investment and regulatory frameworks differ across the UK, utilities organisations nationwide are facing similar pressures. Take two examples: Scottish Water is publicly owned, while Dŵr Cymru (Welsh water) operates as a not-for-profit. Both reinvest the surplus into infrastructure and communities rather than distributing it to shareholders. That means value can be directed back into the network and communities they serve. The innovation happening inside the water industry One of the more persistent misconceptions about water industry careers is that the work is traditional in a way that leaves little room for innovation and the kind of technical challenge that attracts candidates from the more popular mainstream industries. Water utilities are solving genuinely hard problems with emerging tools: AI-driven leakage detection is reducing the volume of treated water lost through distribution networks Digital twins of entire water systems allow engineers to model and test scenarios before committing to capital expenditure Smart metering is generating large, complex datasets that need people who know how to work with them Ofwat's innovation fund has been backing these initiatives through cross-sector collaboration and new approaches to network management and environmental monitoring, creating space for organisations to bring in methodologies from outside the sector. We’ve seen this firsthand through our work with the Northumbrian Water Group. Rullion’s involvement in the NWG Innovation Festival last year has given us a direct window into how utilities are bringing together engineers, technologists, and sustainability specialists to tackle challenges that don’t have an easy answer and are quietly doing some of the most interesting work in the sector. The water industry is preparing for a generational shift The water industry will see over 20% of its experienced professionals retire in the next decade. As innovation reforms how utilities are managed and the pressure on water infrastructure grows, the people who step into those roles will be defining what the sector looks like for the next generation. AMP8-focused capital programmes are already generating demand for data engineers and digital project managers alongside traditional civil and mechanical engineering roles. That demand is only set to grow. For professionals considering a move from construction or energy, the translation is closer than it might appear. Embodied carbon reduction in infrastructure design and programme delivery under regulatory scrutiny are disciplines where experience from adjacent sectors is actively valued. What roles exist in the water industry? Water utilities careers span a wider range of disciplines than most people outside the sector realise, and it is worth mapping them out clearly. Operational and scientific Water quality scientists Treatment process operators Catchment and environmental managers Compliance specialists Laboratory analysts Engineering and capital delivery Civil, mechanical Electrical and process engineers Capital delivery managers Quantity surveyors Project engineers With AMP8 programmes running through to 2030, programme delivery roles are in sustained demand. Digital and data Data engineers Network modelling specialists Smart metering programme managers Digital transformation leads Environmental and sustainability Net zero programme managers Ecological advisors Sustainable drainage specialists Carbon analysts Commercial, finance, and communications Procurement, finance, commercial, and communications functions exist at scale across all major utilities, and experience built in other sectors transfers readily into them. Early career pathways Graduate schemes and degree apprenticeships are well-established entry points for early-career candidates, offering structured development alongside real delivery responsibility from the start. How to start exploring a career in water For candidates looking for work that combines long-term stability, technical challenge, and visible community impact, water industry careers may be worth considering. And the starting points are accessible: CIWEM (the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management) is the professional body for the sector, and a good source of industry insight, events, and career resources Water UK represents the sector's major utilities and publishes workforce and investment data that gives a clear picture of where demand is concentrated WaterAid and The Rivers Trust are worth exploring for candidates drawn to the international development or river catchment dimensions of water work If you’re keen to explore further, the opportunities are already there. Water companies and their supply chains are hiring across engineering, environmental, digital, commercial, project delivery and operational roles. Vacancies are appearing on utilities careers pages, through specialist recruiters, and on major job boards. As a specialist recruitment partner in the utilities sector, we help candidates understand where their skills fit and which opportunities align with the kind of impact they want to make.

By Rullion on 28 May 2026