How to build a business case for changing your MSP provider

BLOGBy Rullion on 30 September 2025

Switching Managed Service Programme (MSP) providers is a major decision. Your first-generation MSP often brings early wins: reducing admin, consolidating suppliers, and bringing much-needed structure to hiring. But as your organisation evolves, those solutions can fall short. Visibility isn’t where it needs to be, processes don’t adapt, and the programme stops keeping pace with future goals. Often, these challenges can be addressed through open conversations with your current provider. But when they can’t, it may be time to consider changing your MSP provider and moving to a second-generation MSP provider, your next partner.

 

5 signs it’s time to switch MSP providers

For leadership, the decision often comes down to proving the return on investment, reducing risk exposure, and ensuring the MSP evolves alongside strategic priorities. Knowing when to make that move isn’t always straightforward, but there are common warning signs that can strengthen your business case:

Limited visibility

If you can’t access accurate, real-time data on workforce spend, supplier performance, or compliance, you’re operating blind. This makes it harder to control costs, demonstrate ROI, or make strategic decisions.

Processes that don’t adapt

When workflows remain rigid and fail to keep pace with evolving business needs or regulatory changes, inefficiency creeps in. This often leads to bottlenecks, slower mobilisation, and higher risk exposure.

Misalignment with strategy

Your MSP provider should act as a partner, not just an administrator. If the programme feels transactional and disconnected from your long-term workforce goals, it weakens your ability to deliver against wider business priorities.

Supplier limitations

An MSP that relies on a narrow supplier network restricts access to talent. This not only slows down hiring for specialist roles but also prevents you from tapping into under-represented or overlooked talent pools.

Lack of innovation

If reporting hasn’t improved in years, technology feels outdated, or the provider isn’t pushing continuous improvement, your MSP may be holding you back instead of helping you move forward.

The next step is turning these challenges into a structured argument that leadership can’t ignore: your business case.

 

What to include in a business case for switching MSP providers

The issues you’ve identified become the evidence, and the improvements you’re aiming for become measurable objectives. By structuring your case around these points, you’ll give stakeholders the confidence that switching MSP providers is a strategic decision, not just a reaction to frustrations.

Executive summary

Think of this section as the “elevator pitch” for your case. If a senior leader only reads one page, it should answer: Why change now, and what will we gain? 

Example: Our current MSP model is not providing the visibility, flexibility, or supplier reach we require. By transitioning to a second-generation provider, we can reduce average cost per hire by 15%, cut mobilisation timelines by 20%, and ensure full compliance visibility across our workforce.

 

Current challenges

This is where you turn warning signs into hard evidence. Leadership will expect more than anecdotes, so use data to back up your points. The stronger your evidence, the harder it is to ignore. Think rising time-to-hire figures, compliance gaps, or supplier underperformance. 

Example:

  • Reporting dashboards are limited, preventing us from tracking supplier performance in real time.
  • Average time-to-hire has risen from 28 to 53 days over the past 12 months, delaying project starts.

 

Objectives 

Objectives show what success looks like after the switch. They should be specific, measurable, and tied directly to organisational priorities. Think of this as the “destination” your business case is leading towards.

Example:

  • Reduce time-to-hire for technical roles by 20%.
  • Achieve 100% compliance audit readiness.
  • Introduce real-time workforce reporting by Q2.

 

Options analysis

Show leadership that you’ve weighed alternatives fairly.

A strong business case doesn’t assume switching is the only option. It shows leadership that every alternative has been considered. Presenting a fair comparison between staying with your current provider and moving to a new one makes your recommendation more credible and balanced.

Example:

Option 1: stay with current provider

  • Pros: continuity.
  • Cons: persistent issues unresolved.

Option 2: switch to new provider

  • Pros: wider supplier network, improved tech, better compliance.
  • Cons: transition costs, short-term disruption (if not managed effectively). 

 

Cost-benefit analysis

Demonstrate how switching creates measurable financial and strategic gains. This could be savings on cost per hire, avoided compliance penalties, or improved project delivery that translates directly into revenue.

Example:

  • Based on current hiring volumes, a reduction of £1,500 per hire equates to £225,000 in annual savings.
  • Avoided compliance fines (based on previous breaches) estimated at £50,000 annually.

 

Implementation plan

Even the best business case will raise the question, “How will we manage the transition?” Your implementation plan reassures stakeholders by showing how risks will be controlled and disruption minimised. Break the plan into phases and set realistic timeframes.

Example:

  • Phase 1: shadow mode (Months 1–2).
  • Phase 2: 50% requisitions managed by new MSP (Months 2-3).
  • Phase 3: full handover (Months 4–6). 

 

KPIs and success measures

Defining KPIs upfront makes your business case measurable and accountable. This section shows how success will be tracked after implementation. Clear measures help leadership see the long-term value of change.

Example:

  • Reduce average time-to-hire from 48 to 38 days within 6 months.
  • Achieve 95% supplier compliance with the agreed SLA by Q3.
  • Deliver full visibility of workforce spend by year-end.

 

Demonstrating ROI: cost vs value

Boards rarely approve a switch without seeing hard numbers. To win them over, your business case must prove that the value of change outweighs the cost of disruption. A simple three-step ROI model makes this clear: the cost of staying put, the cost of switching, and the value gained. Each step should be backed up with data and, where possible, linked to strategic business goals.

1. Cost of staying put

  • (Average cost per hire × annual hires)
  • Compliance breaches, project delays, supplier mark-ups 

2. Cost of switching MSP providers

  • Transition fees, internal resource time, short-term disruption 

3. Value gained

  • Savings from lower mark-ups
  • Reduced compliance risk
  • Faster mobilisation and delivery
  • Stronger supplier performance 


Example:

Our NWG MSP partnership: In 2025, NWG required mobilisation of Information Services (IS), data, cybersecurity, and change management roles with a 4-week deadline (over Christmas) to support their digital transformation. 

  • 100% of contractors were transitioned on time, despite a condensed four-week window and minimal legacy data.
  • Effective contingent workforce management with zero disruption to services, preserving business continuity across mission-critical information systems projects during a peak period for infrastructure planning.
  • £15,000+ saved in the first month alone through improved fulfilment routes and transparent rate control.

This example illustrates how value can be realised quickly. And, when combined with the ROI framework above, it helps build a case that is both credible and compelling.

 

Managing risks during the transition

Even with a strong business case, leaders will ask, “What’s the risk?” Anticipating these concerns will make your case more persuasive. For more guidance, our MSP Implementation Question Checklist highlights the questions you should ask during mobilisation to ensure your programme is set up for success.

  • Operational disruption – delays in hiring or mobilisation. The mitigation for this would be a phased transition, a parallel run for 1–2 months before full handover.
  • Supplier resistance – Preferred suppliers may hesitate to engage. Early communication, clear SLAs, onboarding support
  • Knowledge transfer gaps - Knowledge transfer gaps. Structured handover between outgoing and incoming MSP
  • Compliance lapses – Risk of exposure during transition. Align compliance checks with new provider from Day 1

 

Securing stakeholder buy-in

Different stakeholders view value differently. Map their concerns to your business case:

  • Finance/Board: ROI, predictable spend. Show annual savings, break-even point, and long-term value
  • HR/Operations: Talent access, time-to-hire. Evidence of a wider supplier network and faster fills
  • Compliance: Audit readiness, risk management. Highlight improved governance and real-time visibility
  • Procurement: Supplier performance, cost control, contractual efficiency. Demonstrate stronger supplier management, better rates, and transparent reporting
  • Project Managers: Mobilisation speed. Show reduced delays and faster project delivery

 

The long-term benefits of a 2nd Gen MSP

Your business case should end by showing how a second-generation MSP provider sets the organisation up for future success:

  • Real-time data for strategic workforce planning
  • Stronger governance in highly regulated environments
  • Access to broader supplier networks, including overlooked and under-represented talent pools
  • Faster project mobilisation, reducing time to value
  • Continuous improvement, not stagnation
  • This shifts the decision from a short-term fix to a long-term strategic investment. 

A well-structured business case turns the idea of switching MSPs from a reactive decision into a justified, proactive strategy. It helps provide the confidence that your next MSP partnership will deliver greater value.

And when you reach the point of preparing for mobilisation, our MSP Implementation Checklist is a practical tool to help you ask the right questions and ensure your new programme is set up for long-term success.

 

Share
Interested in how an MSP can improve your contingent workforce management?

Visit our MSP solution page or book a discovery call to see how we can build a programme that supports your organisation's needs.

More like this

BLOG
Does Your Early Careers Strategy Hold Up Under Pressure?

Does Your Early Careers Strategy Hold Up Under Pressure?

Most early careers programmes are built to run. Fewer are built to respond. For organisations in nuclear, energy, water, utilities and rail, that distinction matters. A strong early careers strategy is not simply about filling entry-level roles. It is about building the skills base future projects will depend on. Across these critical infrastructure sectors, hiring is rarely straightforward. Talent pipelines take time to build, and role requirements can shift while a campaign is already live. When an early careers programme cannot adapt mid-campaign, the impact is not limited to one delayed hire or one missed intake. It can create capability gaps that take years to close. That is why agility matters. Not agility as speed for its own sake. Agility as the ability to make informed decisions when conditions change. It means reading the pipeline early enough to spot where candidates are dropping out, then adjusting the campaign before momentum is lost. Jump to: Why critical infrastructure hiring puts early careers strategy under pressure Employer branding affects how quickly your campaign can respond What responsiveness looks like inside the early careers pipeline Fixed supplier models can slow the decisions that matter Shared ownership gives the programme room to move What to ask before your next early careers campaign Why critical infrastructure hiring puts early careers strategy under pressure Early careers hiring in critical infrastructure rarely happens in neat, predictable conditions. Campaigns often have to move before every role specification is fully confirmed. Application volumes can be difficult to forecast, and stakeholder requirements may continue to evolve once activity is already underway. That creates a very different environment from a standard graduate campaign. These organisations are hiring into sectors with long-term workforce needs and specialist technical roles that graduates may not immediately understand. The work is essential, but the career paths are not always obvious from the outside. A graduate may understand the appeal of joining a major technology brand or consultancy much faster than they understand the breadth of opportunity inside a water utility, nuclear operator or rail infrastructure organisation. The pressure is rarely spread evenly across the campaign either. Early talent attraction may appear steady before assessment centres, offer stages, and hiring manager reviews create sudden spikes in activity. A programme planned around a consistent level of resource can quickly become stretched at the moments where pace and judgement matter most. For example: In nuclear early careers, hiring may need input from safety teams or site-based technical stakeholders before candidates can progress. In water utilities, regional hiring needs can make attraction more uneven, with some locations generating strong interest while others need more targeted support. Across critical infrastructure, those kinds of variables make a fixed campaign model difficult to rely on. The added challenge of building an early careers programme from scratch For organisations developing an early careers programme for the first time, those pressures arrive without the benefit of an established model. There may be no reliable historical volume data, no proven channel mix, and no clear benchmark for how candidates will move through the process. “That makes agility important from the beginning, not something that we add once the programme matures. The strategy needs enough structure to give the campaign direction but enough flexibility to respond when conditions change.” - Dan Crerand, Director of Talent & Skills Employer branding affects how quickly your campaign can respond Employer brand is often treated as a pre-campaign activity. Build the message, launch the campaign, and review performance at the end. Graduate employer brand has a direct effect on how much pressure an early careers programme has to absorb during the campaign. Organisations with strong graduate brand recognition arrive with a level of built-in momentum. Candidates already know who they are and understand the offer before the campaign reaches them. That recognition may come from campus activity, peer networks, or previous graduate recruitment campaigns. Employer branding for critical infrastructure organisations Many organisations in nuclear, water utilities, rail, energy and renewables do not have that same advantage at the graduate level. That does not mean the roles are less compelling. Often, the opposite is true. These sectors can offer graduates meaningful work with technical depth and visible impact. The challenge is that the proposition often needs more explanation. In graduate rail recruitment programmes, the range of roles available is often wider than candidates expect. Behind day-to-day operations of the railway sits a business that spans commercial, digital, engineering, project management, and sustainability roles. Across the energy sector, the employer brand challenge may be different again. Organisations need to show how graduate roles connect to grid resilience, decarbonisation, infrastructure investment, or the practical delivery of the energy transition, rather than relying on broad sustainability messaging. If the pipeline is not building in the right disciplines, locations or candidate groups, the early careers strategy has to respond while the campaign is still live. Before applications close, the team may need to change the message and redirect activity or remove friction from the application process. A campaign that only reviews employer branding strategy at the end will always be reacting too late. What responsiveness looks like inside the early careers pipeline Monitor the pipeline while there is still time to act A responsive early careers pipeline is monitored continuously. Not just at headline level, and not only at the point of attraction. The useful questions are more specific: Which disciplines are filling faster than expected? Which locations are under-supplied? Which candidate groups are entering the funnel but not progressing? Where is the process creating friction? Which stages are taking longer than planned? Where are hiring managers becoming a bottleneck? For early careers hiring in rail, energy, nuclear and water utilities, those questions need to be asked early enough to influence the outcome. Knowing there is a shortfall after the campaign closes may help the next intake. Knowing it mid-campaign can protect the current one. Track diversity through every stage Attraction data only tells part of the story; diversity needs the same level of attention. A diversity recruitment strategy has to track candidate movement through every stage of the funnel, from initial engagement through to final acceptance. If female candidates, for example, are entering the early careers pipeline but dropping before completion, that points to a specific issue in the process. It could be: Job description language Website content Assessment communications Confidence levels Perceived fit or the way the opportunity has been framed Dan shared insights from a recent nuclear early careers campaign: “A 13% drop-off among female candidates between initial engagement and completed application highlighted exactly this kind of issue. The value was not in the number alone. It was in seeing the pattern early enough to review what was happening and make a targeted adjustment.” Build in room to change the assessment process Assessment processes also need room to flex. AI-assisted applications are now creating new graduate recruitment challenges and pressures across these safety-critical sectors. Organisations across nuclear, rail, and energy are having to think carefully about how they verify candidate understanding without adding unnecessary friction or delay. This might mean: Introducing an additional screening stage Changing the weighting of an assessment Adapting interview guidance for hiring managers Whatever the response, the key issue is whether the early careers programme can absorb that change without derailing the timeline. A resilient early careers strategy does not assume the original process will remain perfect from launch to offer. It creates the conditions to adjust when the evidence says something needs to change. Fixed supplier models can slow the decisions that matter Where a programme partner is treated as a supplier delivering against a fixed brief, responsiveness becomes harder. A small adjustment can quickly become a request that rolls into the need for reviews and approvals. By the time action is agreed upon, the campaign may already have moved on.That creates decision latency at exactly the wrong moment. For critical infrastructure organisations, the timing matters because internal teams are already carrying significant pressure. Dan noted: “Early careers hiring often sits alongside workforce planning, operational demands, stakeholder management and longer-term skills priorities. If the working model adds handovers or pushes decisions through extra approval loops, the programme becomes slower at the exact moment it needs to respond.” Shared ownership gives the programme room to move A shared ownership model means that both the organisation and the programme partner are working from the same data. Funnel performance is visible, and diversity movement is reviewed at each stage. When risks appear, they are discussed while there is still time to act. Decisions are made jointly, with clear ownership of what happens next. It also means the partner absorbs operational complexity rather than passing it back to the internal team. When attraction needs to shift, the response can be shaped quickly: Assessment spikes can be resourced before they become a bottleneck. Candidate communications can be updated before an issue becomes embedded. Stakeholders receive recommendations based on live evidence rather than end-of-campaign analysis. This is particularly important for organisations investing in an early careers strategy for the first time or scaling an early careers programme across multiple business areas, regions, or technical disciplines. The working relationship has to support the speed of the campaign. Otherwise, even good insight becomes too slow to matter. What to ask before your next early careers campaign Before the next campaign launches, the most useful questions are not only about process, platforms or attraction channels. They are about how the programme will respond when conditions change. What happens if application volume is lower than expected? Who decides when the campaign needs to change? How quickly can messaging, targeting or assessment be adjusted? Where is diversity being tracked beyond attraction? What happens if candidate behaviour shifts mid-campaign? How much pressure can the internal team absorb before delivery starts to suffer? For organisations in nuclear, energy, water utilities, and rail, these questions matter because early careers hiring feeds directly into long-term workforce capability. The strategy needs to look strong before launch, but it also needs to hold up once the campaign is live.

By Rullion on 02 June 2026

BLOG
Exploring purpose-led water industry careers

Exploring purpose-led water industry careers

Careers in the water industry are not always the first place candidates look when they start thinking about purpose-led work. But they should be. There is a gap that sits quietly in the middle of many careers. The work pays the bills and the role is fine on paper. But somewhere underneath the routine, there is a question that does not quite go away: does any of this work actually matter? For a growing number of younger professionals, salary alone no longer drives their career decisions. For Gen Zs and millennials, meaningful work, work-life balance, and a sense of purpose now sit alongside pay as major factors in how they judge employers and career moves. And yet the sectors that get associated with purpose-led work remain a fairly short list: healthcare, education, the third sector, and renewables. The water industry rarely makes that list. And it should. If you are exploring water industry careers for the first time or reconsidering a sector you had already written off, it’s worth taking a second look. Jump to: What does having a purpose-led career actually mean? The utilities sector has a perception problem The climate case for choosing a water industry career Community impact you can actually see The innovation happening inside the water industry What roles exist in the water industry? How to start exploring a career in water What does having a purpose-led career actually mean? “A purpose-led career” has become a phrase that can stretch to cover almost anything, which means it is sometimes vague enough to risk meaning very little. But at its simplest, a purposeful career means your daily output connects to something beyond the business itself. Beyond a company's commercial objectives, there is a positive impact on wider communities and the natural world. Purpose lives inside any sector where the work is essential and the people doing it understand the difference their contribution makes. The water industry sits squarely in that. The question is why so few candidates are looking there. The water sector has a perception problem It would be dishonest to write about water industry careers without addressing the obvious. The sector has had a difficult few years in the public eye, from untreated sewage discharges and high-profile financial difficulties to criticism of executive pay, ageing infrastructure, and concerns about whether the system can keep pace with demand. These issues have formed how many people outside the sector see it. Here’s what doesn’t often make the headlines: The utilities sector is now being held to higher public standards than at any point in recent memory. The Water Industry (Special Measures) Act 2025 gave Ofwat and the Environment Agency stronger enforcement powers, including the ability to block executive bonuses at underperforming companies. Within the rule’s first year of the operation, Ofwat blocked more than £4 million of executive bonuses. This supports the continued focus on transparency and accountability across the water industry. Then there is AMP8. The 2025 to 2030 asset management period represents the largest capital investment programme in the history of the English and Welsh water sector, with approximately £104 billion approved by Ofwat. The people being hired in the near future will help deliver and commission water infrastructure that communities will rely on for decades. Curious about what that means for hiring across the sector? Our Talent on Tap whitepaper dives into the workforce pressures the water industry is up against as AMP8 delivery continues to ramp up. The climate case for choosing a water industry career For candidates drawn to environmental work, the water industry offers something many sectors struggle to provide: a direct connection between daily work and climate outcomes. Water scarcity, flooding resilience, catchment health, and river restoration are active priorities inside water utilities jobs. Catchment scientists are helping restore rivers degraded over decades Environmental compliance engineers are reducing pollution incidents at source Sustainability leads are designing net zero pathways for energy-intensive treatment processes Hydrologists and engineers are delivering storm overflow remediation schemes Ecologists, planners, and landscape specialists focused on nature-based solutions such as wetlands, sustainable drainage, and restored floodplains What makes these careers meaningful is not just the environmental language around them. It is the fact that the outcomes are tangible: storm overflow schemes that reduce untreated discharges into rivers and coastal waters; wetlands and restored floodplains that help manage flooding and improve biodiversity; lower-carbon treatment processes; and infrastructure better equipped for a changing climate. Supporting this, most major utility companies have made net zero commitments, with programmes covering renewable energy generation at treatment works, fleet electrification, sustainable drainage design, and embodied carbon reduction across capital projects. Continuing to show real impact for wider communities. Community impact you can actually see The scale of essential services is difficult to match. Water utilities serve entire populations. It creates a particular kind of professional responsibility that is difficult to replicate elsewhere. These programmes exist across the full breadth of the utilities sector, in urban and rural settings throughout England, Wales, and Scotland. A treatment operations team monitoring water quality through the night so that millions of people can turn on a tap in the morning without thinking about it A network planning team working to ensure pressure holds across a distribution system during a summer heatwave A community engagement lead explaining a storm overflow improvement programme to residents who have watched their local river deteriorate for years While investment and regulatory frameworks differ across the UK, utilities organisations nationwide are facing similar pressures. Take two examples: Scottish Water is publicly owned, while Dŵr Cymru (Welsh water) operates as a not-for-profit. Both reinvest the surplus into infrastructure and communities rather than distributing it to shareholders. That means value can be directed back into the network and communities they serve. The innovation happening inside the water industry One of the more persistent misconceptions about water industry careers is that the work is traditional in a way that leaves little room for innovation and the kind of technical challenge that attracts candidates from the more popular mainstream industries. Water utilities are solving genuinely hard problems with emerging tools: AI-driven leakage detection is reducing the volume of treated water lost through distribution networks Digital twins of entire water systems allow engineers to model and test scenarios before committing to capital expenditure Smart metering is generating large, complex datasets that need people who know how to work with them Ofwat's innovation fund has been backing these initiatives through cross-sector collaboration and new approaches to network management and environmental monitoring, creating space for organisations to bring in methodologies from outside the sector. We’ve seen this firsthand through our work with the Northumbrian Water Group. Rullion’s involvement in the NWG Innovation Festival last year has given us a direct window into how utilities are bringing together engineers, technologists, and sustainability specialists to tackle challenges that don’t have an easy answer and are quietly doing some of the most interesting work in the sector. The water industry is preparing for a generational shift The water industry will see over 20% of its experienced professionals retire in the next decade. As innovation reforms how utilities are managed and the pressure on water infrastructure grows, the people who step into those roles will be defining what the sector looks like for the next generation. AMP8-focused capital programmes are already generating demand for data engineers and digital project managers alongside traditional civil and mechanical engineering roles. That demand is only set to grow. For professionals considering a move from construction or energy, the translation is closer than it might appear. Embodied carbon reduction in infrastructure design and programme delivery under regulatory scrutiny are disciplines where experience from adjacent sectors is actively valued. What roles exist in the water industry? Water utilities careers span a wider range of disciplines than most people outside the sector realise, and it is worth mapping them out clearly. Operational and scientific Water quality scientists Treatment process operators Catchment and environmental managers Compliance specialists Laboratory analysts Engineering and capital delivery Civil, mechanical Electrical and process engineers Capital delivery managers Quantity surveyors Project engineers With AMP8 programmes running through to 2030, programme delivery roles are in sustained demand. Digital and data Data engineers Network modelling specialists Smart metering programme managers Digital transformation leads Environmental and sustainability Net zero programme managers Ecological advisors Sustainable drainage specialists Carbon analysts Commercial, finance, and communications Procurement, finance, commercial, and communications functions exist at scale across all major utilities, and experience built in other sectors transfers readily into them. Early career pathways Graduate schemes and degree apprenticeships are well-established entry points for early-career candidates, offering structured development alongside real delivery responsibility from the start. How to start exploring a career in water For candidates looking for work that combines long-term stability, technical challenge, and visible community impact, water industry careers may be worth considering. And the starting points are accessible: CIWEM (the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management) is the professional body for the sector, and a good source of industry insight, events, and career resources Water UK represents the sector's major utilities and publishes workforce and investment data that gives a clear picture of where demand is concentrated WaterAid and The Rivers Trust are worth exploring for candidates drawn to the international development or river catchment dimensions of water work If you’re keen to explore further, the opportunities are already there. Water companies and their supply chains are hiring across engineering, environmental, digital, commercial, project delivery and operational roles. Vacancies are appearing on utilities careers pages, through specialist recruiters, and on major job boards. As a specialist recruitment partner in the utilities sector, we help candidates understand where their skills fit and which opportunities align with the kind of impact they want to make.

By Rullion on 28 May 2026