How to build a business case for changing your MSP provider

BLOGBy Rullion on 30 September 2025

How to build a business case for changing your MSP provider


Switching Managed Service Programme (MSP) providers is a major decision. Your first-generation MSP often brings early wins: reducing admin, consolidating suppliers, and bringing much-needed structure to hiring. But as your organisation evolves, those solutions can fall short. Visibility isn’t where it needs to be, processes don’t adapt, and the programme stops keeping pace with future goals. Often, these challenges can be addressed through open conversations with your current provider. But when they can’t, it may be time to consider changing your MSP provider and moving to a second-generation MSP provider, your next partner.

5 signs it’s time to switch MSP providers

For leadership, the decision often comes down to proving the return on investment, reducing risk exposure, and ensuring the MSP evolves alongside strategic priorities. Knowing when to make that move isn’t always straightforward, but there are common warning signs that can strengthen your business case:

Limited visibility

If you can’t access accurate, real-time data on workforce spend, supplier performance, or compliance, you’re operating blind. This makes it harder to control costs, demonstrate ROI, or make strategic decisions.

Processes that don’t adapt

When workflows remain rigid and fail to keep pace with evolving business needs or regulatory changes, inefficiency creeps in. This often leads to bottlenecks, slower mobilisation, and higher risk exposure.

Misalignment with strategy

Your MSP provider should act as a partner, not just an administrator. If the programme feels transactional and disconnected from your long-term workforce goals, it weakens your ability to deliver against wider business priorities.

Supplier limitations

An MSP that relies on a narrow supplier network restricts access to talent. This not only slows down hiring for specialist roles but also prevents you from tapping into under-represented or overlooked talent pools.

Lack of innovation

If reporting hasn’t improved in years, technology feels outdated, or the provider isn’t pushing continuous improvement, your MSP may be holding you back instead of helping you move forward.

The next step is turning these challenges into a structured argument that leadership can’t ignore: your business case.

 

What to include in a business case for switching MSP providers

The issues you’ve identified become the evidence, and the improvements you’re aiming for become measurable objectives. By structuring your case around these points, you’ll give stakeholders the confidence that switching MSP providers is a strategic decision, not just a reaction to frustrations.

Executive summary

Think of this section as the “elevator pitch” for your case. If a senior leader only reads one page, it should answer: Why change now, and what will we gain? 

Example: Our current MSP model is not providing the visibility, flexibility, or supplier reach we require. By transitioning to a second-generation provider, we can reduce average cost per hire by 15%, cut mobilisation timelines by 20%, and ensure full compliance visibility across our workforce.

 

Current challenges

This is where you turn warning signs into hard evidence. Leadership will expect more than anecdotes, so use data to back up your points. The stronger your evidence, the harder it is to ignore. Think rising time-to-hire figures, compliance gaps, or supplier underperformance. 

Example:

  • Reporting dashboards are limited, preventing us from tracking supplier performance in real time.

  • Average time-to-hire has risen from 28 to 53 days over the past 12 months, delaying project starts.

 

Objectives 

Objectives show what success looks like after the switch. They should be specific, measurable, and tied directly to organisational priorities. Think of this as the “destination” your business case is leading towards.

Example:

  • Reduce time-to-hire for technical roles by 20%.

  • Achieve 100% compliance audit readiness.

  • Introduce real-time workforce reporting by Q2.

 

Options analysis

Show leadership that you’ve weighed alternatives fairly.

A strong business case doesn’t assume switching is the only option. It shows leadership that every alternative has been considered. Presenting a fair comparison between staying with your current provider and moving to a new one makes your recommendation more credible and balanced.

Example:

Option 1: stay with current provider

  • Pros: continuity.

  • Cons: persistent issues unresolved.

Option 2: switch to new provider

Pros: wider supplier network, improved tech, better compliance.

Cons: transition costs, short-term disruption (if not managed effectively). 

 

Cost-benefit analysis

Demonstrate how switching creates measurable financial and strategic gains. This could be savings on cost per hire, avoided compliance penalties, or improved project delivery that translates directly into revenue.

Example:

  • Based on current hiring volumes, a reduction of £1,500 per hire equates to £225,000 in annual savings.

  • Avoided compliance fines (based on previous breaches) estimated at £50,000 annually.

 

Implementation plan

Even the best business case will raise the question, “How will we manage the transition?” Your implementation plan reassures stakeholders by showing how risks will be controlled and disruption minimised. Break the plan into phases and set realistic timeframes.

Example:

Phase 1: shadow mode (Months 1–2).

Phase 2: 50% requisitions managed by new MSP (Months 2-3).

Phase 3: full handover (Months 4–6). 

 

KPIs and success measures

Defining KPIs upfront makes your business case measurable and accountable. This section shows how success will be tracked after implementation. Clear measures help leadership see the long-term value of change.

Example:

Reduce average time-to-hire from 48 to 38 days within 6 months.

Achieve 95% supplier compliance with the agreed SLA by Q3.

Deliver full visibility of workforce spend by year-end.

 

Demonstrating ROI: cost vs value

Boards rarely approve a switch without seeing hard numbers. To win them over, your business case must prove that the value of change outweighs the cost of disruption. A simple three-step ROI model makes this clear: the cost of staying put, the cost of switching, and the value gained. Each step should be backed up with data and, where possible, linked to strategic business goals.

1. Cost of staying put

  • (Average cost per hire × annual hires)

  • Compliance breaches, project delays, supplier mark-ups 

2. Cost of switching MSP providers

  • Transition fees, internal resource time, short-term disruption 

3. Value gained

  • Savings from lower mark-ups

  • Reduced compliance risk

  • Faster mobilisation and delivery

  • Stronger supplier performance 


Example:

Our NWG MSP partnership: In 2025, NWG required mobilisation of Information Services (IS), data, cybersecurity, and change management roles with a 4-week deadline (over Christmas) to support their digital transformation. 

  • 100% of contractors were transitioned on time, despite a condensed four-week window and minimal legacy data.

  • Effective contingent workforce management with zero disruption to services, preserving business continuity across mission-critical information systems projects during a peak period for infrastructure planning.

  • £15,000+ saved in the first month alone through improved fulfilment routes and transparent rate control.

This example illustrates how value can be realised quickly. And, when combined with the ROI framework above, it helps build a case that is both credible and compelling.

 

Managing risks during the transition

Even with a strong business case, leaders will ask, “What’s the risk?” Anticipating these concerns will make your case more persuasive. For more guidance, our MSP Implementation Question Checklist highlights the questions you should ask during mobilisation to ensure your programme is set up for success.

  • Operational disruption – delays in hiring or mobilisation. The mitigation for this would be a phased transition, a parallel run for 1–2 months before full handover.

  • Supplier resistance – Preferred suppliers may hesitate to engage. Early communication, clear SLAs, onboarding support

  • Knowledge transfer gaps - Knowledge transfer gaps. Structured handover between outgoing and incoming MSP

  • Compliance lapses – Risk of exposure during transition. Align compliance checks with new provider from Day 1

 

Securing stakeholder buy-in

Different stakeholders view value differently. Map their concerns to your business case:

  • Finance/Board: ROI, predictable spend. Show annual savings, break-even point, and long-term value

  • HR/Operations: Talent access, time-to-hire. Evidence of a wider supplier network and faster fills

  • Compliance: Audit readiness, risk management. Highlight improved governance and real-time visibility

  • Procurement: Supplier performance, cost control, contractual efficiency. Demonstrate stronger supplier management, better rates, and transparent reporting

  • Project Managers: Mobilisation speed. Show reduced delays and faster project delivery

 

The long-term benefits of a 2nd Gen MSP

Your business case should end by showing how a second-generation MSP provider sets the organisation up for future success:

  • Real-time data for strategic workforce planning

  • Stronger governance in highly regulated environments

  • Access to broader supplier networks, including overlooked and under-represented talent pools

  • Faster project mobilisation, reducing time to value

  • Continuous improvement, not stagnation

  • This shifts the decision from a short-term fix to a long-term strategic investment. 

A well-structured business case turns the idea of switching MSPs from a reactive decision into a justified, proactive strategy. It helps provide the confidence that your next MSP partnership will deliver greater value.

And when you reach the point of preparing for mobilisation, our MSP Implementation Checklist is a practical tool to help you ask the right questions and ensure your new programme is set up for long-term success.

 

Share

Unlock your full potential.

Tell us what's holding you back, and we'll design a solution specifically for you

More like this

BPSS Clearance: A Smarter Approach to Background Screening

BPSS Clearance: A Smarter Approach to Background Screening

“What exactly is BPSS clearance, and why is it such a big deal for places like Hinkley Point C or Sizewell C?” Sibel asked at the start of our latest Confessions of a Screening Expert conversation. It’s a good question. For many businesses stepping into regulated environments for the first time, Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) checks can feel like a maze of acronyms and requirements. But for Jayne Lee, Candidate Services at Rullion, BPSS is the baseline that keeps projects moving, and people safe. What BPSS Clearance Involves BPSS is the government framework for initial background screening. Jayne describes it as “the baseline of where people need to be cleared to.” It includes: Right to Work check Identity verification Criminal record check (DBS checks) Three years of employment referencing “People sometimes call it the ‘RICE’ model,” Jayne adds. “Right to Work, Identity, Criminal record, and Employment history. It’s a clear structure, and it’s widely recognised as the entry-level clearance for high-security roles.” From there, some roles may require higher levels of clearance (like SC or DV), but BPSS is always the starting point. And while it’s critical at nuclear sites like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, BPSS clearance is increasingly required across other regulated sectors too, including rail, energy, and utilities. The Challenge: Speed Without Compromise At projects like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, every worker - from engineers to ground staff - must hold valid BPSS clearance before stepping on site. Delays here can stall entire workstreams. The industry norm for completing BPSS checks is often 30–40 days. For major infrastructure projects, that’s simply not sustainable. Rullion’s solution: Jayne’s team achieves an average of 7.5 days per clearance. In exceptional cases, they’ve turned around a check in just 24-hours. But it’s not just about speed for speed’s sake. “When you scale up, challenges appear,” Jayne explains. “Last summer we onboarded over 1,000 international workers in one intake. International criminal record checks can push timelines out, but even then, our average was around 15 days — still significantly faster than sector norms.” Read how we deliver screening success at Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C › and see how our approach to BPSS clearance is keeping projects on track while reducing delays across complex supply chains. More Than a System: People First 'Where does this speed come from?' asks Sibel. According to Jayne, it’s the human-led approach that makes the real difference. Before any link or form is sent, every candidate receives a call from a named advisor. “That first call is golden,” says Jayne. “We introduce ourselves, explain the process step by step, and make sure candidates know what documents they’ll need. If they’ve got everything ready, the process sails through.” This proactive support avoids delays caused by missing documents or incomplete forms. And it doesn’t end there: Candidates have a direct phone number and email for their advisor. Clients get weekly catch-up calls to resolve issues quickly. No one is left waiting on a generic helpdesk or traffic-light status update. “It’s not just about compliance,” Jayne adds. “It’s about building trust and momentum.” Where Technology Fits In It’s not all down to people. Smart technology underpins the process, helping keep everything secure, visible, and moving at pace. For candidates, that means a smoother journey with less waiting around. For clients, it means instant oversight of their workforce, so they know exactly where things stand. “It’s the combination that works,” Jayne explains. “Automation helps with speed, but human oversight ensures accuracy, engagement, and problem-solving along the way.” Common Challenges, Clear Solutions Every project has its hurdles. This approach balances governance, compliance, and candidate experience all without sacrificing speed. Jayne outlines a few common ones, and how her team resolves them: Challenge Solution Candidates are slow to provide documents. Early preparation calls mean candidates know exactly what to have ready. International workers require overseas checks. Dedicated advisors manage timelines and keep clients informed, so expectations are clear. Clients worry about visibility. The portal and weekly calls ensure full transparency at every stage. Final Word from the Screening Expert Jayne has spent over 13 years in background screening. Her verdict? “BPSS clearance isn’t just a box to tick. Done right, it’s what keeps projects moving and candidates engaged. It’s about being quick, yes - but also accurate, compliant, and supportive. That’s where the human element really matters.” For organisations, the key takeaway is clear: background screening services are most effective when they combine smart technology with a human touch. This article is part of the Confessions of a Screening Expert series, where Sibel Akel, Marketing Director at Rullion, speaks with Jayne Lee and other industry leaders about the realities of screening in regulated sectors.

By Rullion on 25 September 2025

NEWS
Rullion receives 'Highly Commended' at the 2025 APSCo OutSource Awards for Excellence

Rullion receives 'Highly Commended' at the 2025 APSCo OutSource Awards for Excellence

This recognition reflects the strength of our Managed Service Programme (MSP) delivery and our long-standing partnerships with clients such as E.ON, Siemens and Northumbrian Water. These are complex, regulated environments where trust, compliance and responsiveness are critical – and where our recruitment outsourcing solutions are making a measurable difference. Why the APSCo Awards Matter APSCo’s OutSource Awards for Excellence are highly respected in the staffing industry, celebrating organisations that deliver innovative, compliant and scalable workforce solutions. Recognition from APSCo highlights the value of strategic MSP services in a market where organisations face skills shortages, tighter regulation and growing reliance on contingent workforces to keep operations running. Lindsay Harrison, Chief Customer Officer at Rullion, said: “Judges recognised Rullion for its ability to deliver recruitment outsourcing programmes that combine scale, compliance, and exceptional service. With a 90% client retention rate and partnerships spanning decades, Rullion has proven its ability to build long-term trust with organisations across critical infrastructure.” We’re grateful to APSCo and the judging panel for this recognition and extend our congratulations to the winners. We’re proud to be part of a community that celebrates excellence in recruitment outsourcing. What the Judges Said Lindsay Harrison, Chief Customer Officer at Rullion, said: In their announcement, APSCo shared: “Judges recognised Rullion for its ability to deliver recruitment outsourcing programmes that combine scale, compliance, and exceptional service. With a 90% client retention rate and partnerships spanning decades, Rullion has proven its ability to build long-term trust with organisations across critical infrastructure.” They also praised our NPS of 93, innovative direct sourcing strategies, and ability to manage complex transitions without disruption. Clients consistently describe Rullion as a true extension of their teams. A Proven MSP Model Our Managed Service Programme is built to handle the challenges of contingent workforce management at scale. Whether it’s sourcing highly skilled engineers for the energy sector, managing compliance for regulated utility environments, or ensuring rapid deployment of contractors across infrastructure projects, our MSP model gives clients the confidence that every aspect of workforce delivery is covered. We’ve invested in direct sourcing to improve quality, reduce time-to-hire and deliver cost savings. At E.ON, for example, we achieved 100% direct hires, cut time-to-hire by 15%, and improved interview-to-offer conversion rates by 25%. People-First, Insight-Led Delivery Our success isn’t only about processes and metrics. It comes from a people-first approach that prioritises partnership, communication and cultural alignment. We know that managing a contingent workforce is not just about filling vacancies, it’s about creating a seamless experience for hiring managers, contractors and stakeholders. We support this with an insight-led model that measures five key areas: compliance, cost savings, operational excellence, innovation, and social value. This allows us to track impact and continuously improve our MSP delivery. Alongside business results, we embed ESG principles into our programmes, from inclusive recruitment practices to supporting local supply chains and delivering social value in the communities we serve. Looking Ahead The demand for agile and resilient workforce models is only increasing. Organisations across energy, utilities, and infrastructure face rising pressure to balance compliance with innovation while securing scarce skills. As an MSP service provider, we’re committed to helping clients adapt, scale effectively, and unlock long-term value from their contingent workforce. Winning this recognition at the APSCo OutSource Awards highlights the ongoing commitment of our teams to deliver MSP solutions that make a measurable difference for clients. For us, this commendation is about more than a single programme. It reflects the day-to-day commitment of our people to deliver people-first, insight-led MSP solutions that evolve with our clients' needs.

By Rullion on 19 September 2025

NEWS
Delivering Proven Screening Success at Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C

Delivering Proven Screening Success at Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C

Rullion has been a trusted candidate background screening provider since 2014, playing a vital role in supporting major UK nuclear infrastructure projects, including Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C. Working across multiple delivery partners and project phases, we’ve helped embed consistent, compliant, and candidate-friendly screening at scale. With over 8,000 candidates screened annually and clearance times reduced to an average of just 7.5 days, our model continues to support project momentum and onboarding efficiency - while maintaining the highest standards of compliance and governance. The Challenge To keep momentum on projects of this scale, pre-employment screening must be robust, accurate, and fast. Every individual working on site requires BPSS (Baseline Personnel Security Standard) clearance before work can begin. With multiple stakeholders, evolving regulatory requirements, and high volumes of candidates, the background screening process can be complex to manage, even with established systems in place. Our clients needed a nuclear screening provider who could bring clarity, consistency, and pace to an already demanding environment. What project teams need: Timely and accurate delivery of BPSS clearance and related vetting checks A positive, well-supported candidate experience Screening support delivered direct to projects like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, and across Tier 1 contractors and their supply chains Real-time visibility, control, and governance in screening processes Tier 1 contractors are the principal delivery partners on major projects such as Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C. Supporting them means enabling their workforces and suppliers to clear vetting efficiently, reducing risk of onboarding delays. A Proven Screening Model for Nuclear Environments Our nuclear screening model has evolved over years of delivery, working across early careers, agency-supplied workers, and permanent hires. The service model is grounded in best practice, with compliance and candidate experience at its core. Our solution is built on five key pillars: 1. Speed with Precision We consistently reduce average BPSS clearance times from 30-40 days to fewer than 8 days, using: A dedicated screening portal with automated timelines Electronic document collection via DocuSign One-to-one support from trained candidate advisors “We’re consistently achieving clearances in 7–8 days - and in urgent cases, we’ve turned around checks in just 24 hours,” says Jayne Lee, Head of Screening. 2. BPSS and Beyond We manage all core BPSS clearance elements: Right to work (RTW) Identity and address verification Criminal record checks (DBS) Three to five years referencing We also support CTC and SC clearance preparation where needed, compiling candidate packs ready for formal review. 3. Human-Led Candidate Experience Every candidate is assigned a named advisor who supports them through the screening journey; they answer questions, collect documents, and maintain engagement from start to finish. “We know how to reach the right contact for a reference. Our proactive approach keeps things moving,” adds Jayne. 4. Real-Time Governance Our clients benefit from full transparency throughout: Live dashboards and candidate status tracking SLA-based monitoring and escalation Monthly reporting and governance in screening audits 5. Scalable Across Supply Chains Our solution is used not only by project leads but by Tier 1 contractors across both Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C. The model scales to support different business units and workforce types including; contractors, agency workers, and permanent staff Impact to Date Over 8,000 candidates screened annually 75% reduction in average screening times +69 Net Promoter Score (NPS) from screened candidates BPSS compliance embedded with live audit capability Fully digital, mobile-friendly experience Adopted by Tier 1s across the project supply chain A Benchmark for Nuclear Screening Rullion’s screening model is now a recognised example of best practice in regulated environments, supporting complex infrastructure programmes where delays and drop-offs can have significant impact. We continue to support project teams across Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, delivering the confidence and control they need to move quickly and compliantly. If you’d like to explore how our model could support your screening processes, get in touch with our team. Curious about common pitfalls? Read our guide on pre-employment screening mistakes.

By Rullion on 18 September 2025