RPO vs Traditional Recruitment: Which hiring model is right for you?

BLOGBy Rullion on 13 November 2025

 

 

The evolution of permanent recruitment models has been remarkable over the past ten years. The once simple decision between in-house and agency recruitment has evolved into a dynamic landscape saturated with options, all designed to provide organisations with enhanced flexibility, control, and efficiency.

The three most common models include Permanent Recruitment, Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO), and RPO On-Demand. Each serves a different purpose, but understanding where one ends and another begins can be challenging.

Each plays a unique role in the journey of business growth, yet understanding the transition from one to the next can be difficult.

This bitesize guide outlines the unique offerings of each model, highlights their differences, and provides insights on selecting the approach that aligns perfectly with your hiring requirements.

Click to navigate:

 

What is Permanent Recruitment?

Permanent recruitment, commonly known as perm recruitment, represents the classic agency model that many businesses recognise. This approach focuses on securing permanent employees rather than relying on temporary or contract arrangements.

Agencies are often engaged by clients to enhance their internal hiring teams or talent acquisition efforts, either for particular positions or when specialised knowledge is needed. The recruitment agency identifies, screens, and presents candidates for specific roles. It continues to be the preferred choice for organisations in need of flexibility or assistance with specialised positions. Yet, permanent recruitment models vary significantly. Here are the three primary approaches:

Contingency: Multiple agencies vie to fill the same vacancy, with payment awarded solely to the agency that successfully places a candidate. This approach emphasises rapid execution and network reach, but it may result in inconsistent quality.

Exclusive: A single agency is granted exclusivity to fill the role within a specified timeframe. The recruiter can dedicate more time in sourcing and screening, free from competing with others.

Retained: An agency is formally engaged on a retained basis (often with part payment upfront) to conduct a bespoke search. This is common for senior, specialist, or hard-to-fill roles and involves a consultative partnership that includes thorough candidate assessments.

Many clients manage agency relationships through a bank of approved agencies, called a Preferred Supplier List (PSL). Some PSLs are tightly structured with defined service levels and performance reviews; others evolve informally based on trust and track record. Over time, HR or talent teams learn which partners deliver best for particular disciplines or regions. For agencies, earning a spot on a PSL means proving consistent delivery and understanding a client’s culture beyond individual vacancies.

 

When Perm Recruitment is most effective

Permanent recruitment offers flexibility and taps into extensive networks, but it can become expensive or unpredictable when scaling up hiring efforts. This model is ideal for:

  • Companies experiencing minimal or consistent recruitment activity.
  • Companies in need of specialised talent that is hard to find within their own ranks.
  • Businesses seeking quick solutions without the burden of long-term obligations.

 

What is an RPO? 

Recruitment Process Outsourcing, commonly known as RPO, involves delegating all or part of your recruitment function to an external provider. An RPO partner integrates seamlessly into your organisation, taking charge of recruitment from start to finish or at specific stages, rather than tackling each vacancy individually.

This partnership is designed to enhance efficiency while elevating candidate quality and ensuring predictable costs. Some RPO partners go beyond the conventional scope of recruitment to also cover workforce planning, internal mobility, and talent analytics.

 

How RPO transforms hiring

The RPO model gives organisations enterprise-level capability without expanding their internal headcount. A mature RPO solution will often go beyond typical RPO hiring to build an infrastructure recruitment that seamlessly combines specialist knowledge and operational excellence.

The RPO model gives organisations with enterprise-level capabilities while keeping internal headcount in check. An advanced RPO solution exceeds conventional hiring practices, creating a recruitment infrastructure that effortlessly integrates operational excellence with your people, processes, and technology.

This may include:

  • Sourcing and screening candidates at scale.
  • Crafting a compelling employer branding and enhancing the candidate journey.
  • Deploying applicant tracking systems and analytics dashboards.
  • Providing real-time hiring metrics and insights into the talent market.
  • Introducing workforce planning and internal mobility strategies.

 

Benefits of RPO 

Partnering with an RPO provider can transform how you attract, engage, and retain talent. In addition to improving process efficiency, the model delivers tangible business impact across:

  • Consistency – every candidate experiences the same process, strengthening the employer brand.
  • Cost efficiency – lower cost per hire through process optimisation and reduced agency reliance.
  • Scalability – resources adjust seamlessly to meet hiring demand.
  • Strategic partnership – dedicated experts continuously refine processes and outcomes.
  • Visibility – Utilising data-driven reporting to improve decision-making.

In a typical RPO partnership, it's not unusual to see time-to-hire improvements of around 20–30%  once processes are standardised. 

 

When is the right time for an RPO model?

RPO is ideal for organisations experiencing high or variable hiring demands, working across multiple business units, or looking at ambitious growth targets. This model is particularly effective when recruitment demands exceed internal capability or when a business wants to elevate talent acquisition to a strategic level.

 

What is RPO On-Demand?

On-Demand RPO takes the structure and expertise of RPO and applies it flexibly for short-term or project-based needs. Often referred to as Project RPO or RPO Lite, this solution is designed for organisations seeking a more organised and proactive strategy than traditional agency recruitment, without the need for a complete outsourcing partnership. 

 

How RPO On-Demand works

An RPO On-Demand provider seamlessly integrates with your internal team for a fixed period or defined project. Specialist recruiters or campaign managers join your existing processes, elevating them to help you deliver outcomes fast. Our RPO On-demand solution consists of five core modules: talent consultancy, talent outsourcing, search and select, campaign management, and early careers consultancy. You pay only for what suits your needs.

 

Benefits of RPO On-Demand

Many organisations use RPO On-Demand to enhance recruitment performance and gather valuable insights before evolving into a long-term RPO partnership. The typical benefits of project RPO include:

  • Quick access to experienced recruiters and technology.
  • Ability to scale up or down in weeks rather than months.
  • Lower fixed cost and no long-term contract.
  • Improved time to hire through proven processes.
  • Continuity and brand consistency for candidates.

 

When Businesses Use RPO On-Demand

RPO On-Demand is particularly effective when internal capacity and timelines or project scope shift unexpectedly. It lets organisations scale quickly without losing control of quality. Common use cases include:

  • Rapid scaling following new investment or expansion.
  • Launching a new site, division, or product line.
  • Short-term spikes in hiring volume, such as seasonal peaks.
  • Overloaded internal teams needing extra resource.
  • Testing outsourced recruitment before committing to full RPO.

 

Comparing perm recruitment, RPO, and RPO On-demand

In practice, the difference lies in how much control and structure you want. Permanent recruitment offers flexibility and reach for individual roles. RPO On-Demand introduces dedicated expertise on a project basis. Full RPO embeds that expertise permanently, transforming recruitment into a scalable business function.

Feature

Perm Recruitment

RPO

RPO On-Demand

Commitment

Per-hire engagement

Longer-term partnership

Project or campaign

Scope

Individual roles

Part of or end-to-end process

Modular services

Scalability

Limited

Very high (enterprise-wide)

High (short-term)

Control

Agency-led

Outsourced and strategic

Shared with internal team

Cost model

Fee per placement

Monthly or per-hire SLA

Pay-as-you-use

Best for

One-off or specialist hires

Continuous, large scale recruitment

Rapid or project hiring

 

How to choose the right recruitment model

The best recruitment model depends on your hiring patterns, internal capability, and business goals. 

Ask yourself:

  • How variable are our hiring volumes?
  • Do we want to own or outsource recruitment infrastructure?
  • What level of visibility and reporting do we need?
  • How fast do we need to scale?

The answers help identify whether agility, scalability, or partnership is your priority.

Here are a few guiding scenarios:

  • You hire fewer than 10 people a year: Permanent recruitment keeps the process light and flexible.
  • You have an internal team but face short-term growth or transformation: RPO On-Demand gives temporary capacity and expertise.
  • You hire 200+ people a year or across multiple site and disciplines: RPO provides end-to-end structure and the consistency to garner measurable results.

 

Permanent recruitment, RPO On-Demand and full RPO hiring models each bring a different balance of flexibility, control, and partnership. The key is aligning your approach with your organisation’s stage of growth and the outcomes you want from your hiring process.

For smaller businesses or one-off hires, agility and speed may matter most. For growing organisations, scalability and consistency often take priority. And for large enterprises, the value lies in visibility, insight, and long-term talent capability.

Reviewing your current pain points, such as time to hire, candidate quality, or recruiter workload, can help reveal whether your existing approach still serves your future goals. Here are five signs your hiring strategy needs a serious overhaul.

 

 

 

Share
Curious which model fits your business best?

Tell us what's holding you back, and we'll design a specific solution that helps you get work done.

 

 

 

More like this

Nuclear Workforce Planning in 2026

Nuclear Workforce Planning in 2026

The UK’s nuclear sector is moving into 2026 with clear momentum. By September 2025, UK civil nuclear employment had reached just under 100,000 roles, a record high. Growth is being driven by a wider mix of programmes than many people assume. It’s not only large-scale new builds; it’s also fleet operations, defuelling, decommissioning, supply chain activity, and emerging delivery models like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) beginning to shape future nuclear workforce planning. At the same time, government direction is becoming clearer. The UK’s long-term nuclear sector plan is increasingly defined through national roadmapping and policy signalling with an emphasis on sustained nuclear capability through to 2050. And that has implications for how workforce strategy is shaped in 2026. Delve into (and jump to): Why 2026 is a turning point for workforce planning in the nuclear sector One sector, very different workforce needs The skills shaping nuclear hiring in 2026 Where nuclear workforce planning breaks down What better nuclear workforce planning looks like in practice What major programmes are signalling in 2026 Why 2026 is a turning point for workforce planning in the nuclear sector The nuclear workforce challenge is often described as a shortage issue. In reality, the pressure points in 2026 are more specific and more operational. This year sits at the intersection of several competing demands: Major new build delivery continuing at scale (including Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C) Sustained demand across the existing nuclear fleet, including operations and nuclear life extension planning Long-term decommissioning and waste management programmes continuing nationally Rising expectations around safety, quality, assurance, and regulatory compliance Growing demand for digitally enabled engineering and delivery capability Increased attention on the workforce implications of SMRs, including the shift toward repeatability and standardised delivery models In 2026, the same skill sets are being pulled in multiple directions at once: across different sites, delivery stages, and risk environments. The result is a more competitive hiring landscape, leading to longer lead times for scarce capability and higher consequences when workforce planning is reactive. One sector, very different workforce needs “Nuclear recruitment” is often treated as one market. Where in actuality, it’s several markets layered together, and the differences matter. Workforce requirements shift dramatically depending on where a programme sits in the lifecycle: New build delivery Ongoing operations Life extension activity Defueling and decommissioning Emerging delivery models like SMRs Each stage behaves differently in terms of supply, scarcity, onboarding time, and compliance requirements. Design & Engineering Design and early engineering work tend to rely heavily on: Systems and discipline engineering (mechanical, electrical, C&I) Safety case and assurance capability Governance, documentation, and regulatory awareness This is also where “transferable skills” can genuinely work. But only when expectations are set properly. Nuclear environments reward structured thinking, documentation quality, and delivery discipline as much as technical capability. This is increasingly relevant as SMR conversations mature. While the delivery model differs from large-scale builds, the fundamentals remain consistent: nuclear-grade quality mixed with engineering rigour and configuration control. Construction & Commissioning Nuclear workforce growth becomes most visible and most pressured here. In 2026, what becomes most challenging has more to do with readiness than availability. Projects don’t simply need people who can do the work. They need people who can deliver at pace to nuclear standards, within nuclear governance. Early workforce planning here is what can prevent project bottlenecks later. Construction and commissioning typically demand: High-volume site delivery capability Strong quality culture (inspection, welding, fabrication, assurance) Commissioning expertise aligned to safety and compliance expectations Logistics, HSE leadership, and interface management Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Operations is where nuclear becomes long-term. This is also where nuclear life extension activity becomes a real workforce driver in its own right. Extending the operating life of existing stations relies on retained knowledge and stable capability, and not just recruitment volume. These roles depend on: Reliability and asset performance expertise Maintenance planning and outage delivery Compliance, governance, and leadership maturity Deep site knowledge and consistency Decommissioning & Waste Management Decommissioning is sometimes underweighted in workforce conversations, despite being one of the most sustained drivers of UK nuclear employment. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s (NDA) Draft Business Plan 2026–29 (published December 2025) reinforces decommissioning as a long-duration national programme, with ongoing workforce requirements across dismantling, waste handling, remediation, and programme leadership. This work is often less visible than new builds, but it remains essential to the credibility and delivery of the UK’s wider nuclear programme. Check out our interview with Deep Fission’s CEO, Liz Muller, on rethinking nuclear waste management. The skills shaping nuclear hiring in 2026 Demand in nuclear workforce planning isn’t only about headcount. It’s about the right capability, in the right place, at the right time, delivered to the right nuclear standards. As we move through 2026, pressure remains high in areas such as: Electrical engineering and C&I Systems integration and commissioning Quality, inspection, and assurance Safety case and regulatory-aligned delivery roles Project controls (planning, cost engineering, scheduling) Construction management and interface coordination Digital capability (safety, configuration control, performance) What’s notable in 2026 is that these skills are needed across multiple programme types at once. Across the lifecycle, one theme remains consistent: technical skill matters, but so does the ability to operate inside nuclear governance, with process discipline, documentation quality, and assurance expectations playing a key part of the job. Where nuclear workforce planning breaks down Even with all this nuclear sector growth, one of the biggest friction points is the gap between nuclear talent having the right technical background and being fully ready for nuclear delivery environments. That “missing middle” tends to show up in areas like: Project-readiness and site-readiness Compliance and assurance expectations Safety culture alignment Documentation standards and quality processes Geography adds another layer. Large programmes require both regional workforce development and national mobilisation. Without both, pressure builds quickly in local markets. This is why early workforce activity matters. Early shaping of pipelines leads to early team stabilisation and less reactive delivery, especially when multiple programmes are driving demand simultaneously. This is where an abundance mindset matters most. The constraint isn’t that talent doesn’t exist. It’s that readiness is uneven and pathways into nuclear delivery remain too narrow. When organisations invest early in conversion, onboarding and nuclear-grade standards, capacity expands quickly. When they don’t, scarcity feels permanent. “The challenge in nuclear isn’t a lack of people. It’s that capability is arriving at different levels of readiness, at different times, across different programmes. Workforce planning is about aligning that, not just filling roles.”— James Chamberlain, Nuclear, Sector Director, Rullion What better nuclear workforce planning looks like The most effective workforce strategies in 2026 share a few key traits: Plan by lifecycle phase, not just job titles Nuclear delivery depends on sequencing. Workforce planning needs to follow the demand curve across the lifecycle and not just the current open vacancy list. This forward planning can noticeably start to reduce risk: Clearer lead times Better mobilisation Fewer last-minute compromises on quality or readiness Build structured routes for scarce and transferable capability The sector can’t rely only on nuclear-experienced talent. But “transferable” doesn’t mean instant. Transitions work best when there is clear structure around: Expectations and standards Onboarding and compliance readiness Progression pathways once inside the sector Where skills are transferable but nuclear readiness takes time, Train to Deploy helps build job-ready nuclear talent by combining targeted training with your delivery standards, so people arrive ready to contribute from day one. Invest in early careers with conversion in mind The National Nuclear Strategic Plan for Skills includes commitments to scale early career routes, including the ambition to double apprentices entering the nuclear workforce by academic year 2025/26, with 2,500+ apprentices joining the nuclear workforce in 2024/25. The differentiator is what happens after entry: development pathways, retention, and long-term capability building. Treat workforce as delivery risk management In critical infrastructure, workforce constraints don’t only slow hiring. They affect commissioning timelines, quality performance, and programme confidence. This becomes even more important when the sector is balancing large-scale builds, fleet operations, life extensions, decommissioning delivery, and next-generation programme development such as SMRs. “You can’t separate workforce planning from mobilisation. If screening, onboarding, and readiness aren’t designed for scale, the workforce exists on paper but not on site.” — Jayne Lee, Head of Candidate Services, Rullion What major programmes are signalling in 2026 Sizewell C is a strong example of early workforce momentum, and it sits within a wider landscape that includes major delivery demand at Hinkley Point C and sustained activity across operational and decommissioning sites. In the last month, Sizewell C has reported: Around 2,000 workers onsite More than 100 apprentices appointed Around £3bn in contracts awarded to 400+ UK suppliers Continued regional supply chain mobilisation Early pipeline activity is already shaping workforce readiness, long before peak construction demand. This is the direction the wider market is moving in: earlier engagement, clearer forecasting, and more structured talent strategies across delivery phases. The nuclear hiring landscape in 2026 2026 will continue to be a strong year for the UK nuclear sector, but it will also be a demanding one. The organisations that deliver best will be those that approach nuclear workforce planning as a core part of programme execution: Anticipating scarcity early Building structured pipelines Protecting delivery confidence through quality and readiness Creating workforce models that can scale across multiple sites and phases

By Rullion on 04 February 2026