6 Key Considerations When Changing Your MSP Provider

BLOGBy Rullion on 23 July 2025

Discover key considerations for choosing your first MSP provider and ensure you select the right partner to manage your contingent workforce effectively.

Changing your MSP provider is a significant decision that can impact the management of your contingent workforce. Whether you're unhappy with the service, nearing the end of your contract, or simply exploring other options, there are several key factors to consider before making the switch. From understanding your contract and technology needs to planning for a smooth implementation, this guide covers the crucial aspects to ensure you choose the right MSP and make the transition as seamless as possible. 

For organisations that rely heavily on a contingent workforce, selecting the right MSP provider is critical. By carefully considering these six key factors, you can minimise disruption, reduce risk, and ensure that your new MSP can support your operational goals. 

  1. Why Change Your MSP Provider? 

  1. Assessing Your Contract and Exit Clauses 

  1. Technology Considerations for Transition 

  1. Impact of Changing Your Account Team 

  1. Building a Strong Business Case for Change 

  1. Successful Implementation and Communication Strategies 

Why Change Your MSP Provider? 

Before making a change, it’s important to first understand why you’re considering switching your Managed Service Provider (MSP). Are you dissatisfied with the level of service you’re receiving? Do you find that your current MSP doesn’t provide enough flexibility or efficiency in managing your contingent workforce? 

Key questions to ask include: 

  • Are you struggling with a lack of visibility or control over workforce spend? 

  • Is your current MSP unable to deliver in terms of compliance and risk management? 

  • Do you feel that your current provider lacks access to specialised talent, leaving you with recruitment challenges? 

  • Are your workforce strategies reactive, rather than proactive? 

For example, in industries like Energy and Utilities, workforce compliance and access to skilled labour are paramount. An MSP can help streamline compliance management while providing access to a broader pool of specialised workers. Similarly, in the Transport & Rail sector, workforce scalability and cost management can be a major challenge, making an MSP a valuable solution to optimise these areas. 

Having clarity on these points will not only help you articulate what you need but also ensure that the MSP you choose is better equipped to meet your goals. If you’re unsure, it might be worth speaking to a few MSP providers to understand how their services differ and which one can meet your unique needs. 

Assessing Your Contract and Exit Clauses 

Once you’ve established why you want to make the change, it’s time to turn your attention to your current MSP contract. Thoroughly review the terms of the agreement, specifically focusing on exit clauses. A strong contract will usually have an exit management section that outlines the steps for transitioning to a new provider. 

In particular, it’s crucial to understand: 

  • The notice period required for termination 

  • The responsibilities of the current provider during the transition 

  • Whether there are any penalties or fees for early termination 

The exit process can be complicated, especially if your MSP uses proprietary technology or has specific arrangements with suppliers. Make sure you’re clear on what happens with the current workforce, especially any contingent workers who may transition to a new MSP. 

Technology Considerations for Transition 

Technology is at the heart of efficient contingent workforce management. A well-integrated Vendor Management System (VMS) can help you track performance, manage workers, and ensure compliance with regulations. However, if your current MSP is using a proprietary or heavily customised system, you may not be able to keep it when switching to a new provider. Even with third-party technology, compatibility and transition agreements should be clearly understood before making the change. 

Key Technology Considerations: 

  • Proprietary VMS: If your current MSP uses a proprietary system, confirm whether this technology can be transferred to a new provider or if you’ll need to switch to a new platform. 

  • Customisation: Some MSPs spend significant resources customising their VMS for your business. Be sure to clarify whether your new provider can retain or adapt the custom features you rely on. 

  • Integration: Make sure that any new system integrates well with your existing HR, payroll, or finance systems to ensure smooth operations during the transition. 

Switching to an MSP with an updated, more advanced system can provide improved visibility, better compliance management, and more efficient recruitment processes. But it's essential to evaluate whether this will cause disruptions or require extra training for your team. 

Additionally, ensure the technology supports real-time data and robust reporting tools, especially in sectors like Tech or Energy, where data insights drive strategic decision-making. This added visibility will enhance operational efficiency and ensure better cost control. 

Impact of Changing Your Account Team 

One aspect often overlooked when switching MSP providers is the impact on your account team. It’s easy to assume that your existing account manager or team will transition with you, but this may not always be the case. 

Understanding TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment): 
In some cases, the account team may be eligible for transfer under TUPE regulations. However, this doesn’t guarantee that the account team will remain with your new provider. They may opt to stay with your current MSP, move to another opportunity within their business, or leave the company entirely. 

It’s important to discuss this with both your outgoing and incoming MSPs so you have a clear understanding of who will be managing your account post-transition. An experienced team that knows your business can smooth the transition and provide continuity. 

Building a Strong Business Case for Change 

Switching MSP providers is a significant move, so it’s crucial to build a strong business case before taking the plunge. Engaging all key stakeholders in the process - from procurement and HR to finance and operations - is essential to ensuring that everyone is on board. 

When building your case, consider: 

  • Stakeholder feedback: Gather insights from teams who interact with the MSP regularly to understand what’s working well and what isn’t. 

  • Clear goals: Set clear objectives for what you want from a new MSP, such as better compliance, improved cost management, or access to a wider talent pool. 

  • Cost-benefit analysis: Weigh the costs of switching providers (such as transition expenses, implementation, and potential downtime) against the long-term benefits that a new MSP could provide. 

Involving all relevant teams early on ensures that everyone has a say and helps mitigate resistance to change down the line. A collaborative approach leads to a more effective transition and a smoother process overall. 

Successful Implementation and Communication Strategies 

Successful implementation requires careful planning and coordination across multiple stakeholders. The first step is to define clear roles and responsibilities, ensuring that everyone understands what is expected during the transition. 

Key factors to consider: 

  • Stakeholder involvement: Identify key individuals who will be responsible for managing the transition, such as project managers or team leads from HR, procurement, finance, and IT. 

  • Clear communication plan: A detailed communication strategy is vital to keeping all stakeholders informed about the progress of the transition. This includes informing your hiring managers, contingent workforce, and internal staff about the changes. 

  • Regular updates: Set up regular implementation meetings and establish a steering group to oversee the transition process, ensuring that issues are addressed promptly and that everyone is aligned on the timeline. 

Business Continuity

At Rullion, we prioritise business continuity during transitions. Through careful planning and project management, we ensure that operations remain smooth with minimal disruption. Any potential risks are addressed proactively, ensuring that your business remains on track throughout the transition process. 

Effective communication helps to minimise disruptions and ensures that all parties are prepared for the change. Additionally, by communicating early and often, you’ll reduce the risk of uncertainty and dissatisfaction among your workers. 

Conclusion

Changing your MSP provider doesn’t need to be a painful process if approached with careful planning and thoughtful consideration. By taking the time to assess your reasons for making the change, reviewing your contract, evaluating technology needs, and ensuring proper stakeholder engagement, you can ensure a smoother transition that benefits your organisation in the long run. 

If you're ready to explore how Rullion’s MSP services can support your business, visit our MSP solution page or book a discovery call with one of our consultants today. 

Share
Looking for a strategic workforce partner?

We’re proud to help critical infrastructure organisations through strategic MSP and contingent workforce solutions. If you’re looking for a workforce solutions provider that solves problems today and builds stronger, more inclusive talent strategies for tomorrow, explore our MSP solution or book a discovery call today. Let’s help you get work done.

More like this

The Procurement Guide to MSP Cost Models

The Procurement Guide to MSP Cost Models

Why your MSP cost model matters A Managed Service Programme (MSP) can transform how you manage your contingent workforce, but only if you get the commercials right. An accurate MSP cost model is the foundation of any successful MSP procurement; it helps you compare bids on a like-for-like basis, build a credible business case for your executive board, and avoid unexpected costs once the contract begins. Yet, many procurement teams still find cost modelling a sticking point. Data gaps, inconsistent supplier quotes, and unclear pricing structures can quickly derail your evaluation process. As a leading MSP solution provider for critical infrastructure businesses, we’ve supported procurement teams from leading nuclear organisations to nationwide utilities providers with their MSP pricing models. Our deep domain experience means we can balance regulatory compliance, operational resilience, and cost efficiency, helping you get work done without compromising. We’ve created this guide to break down how to create a clear and commercially sound MSP cost model that enables effective comparisons of potential suppliers so you can make decisions with confidence and ensure contingent workforce cost savings. Things to consider with MSP Cost Models How much does an MSP in recruitment typically cost? How much money can you save with a managed service programme? How to compare managed service provider cost models Final checklist for your procurement cost-saving strategies Book a cost-model review session How much does an MSP in recruitment typically cost? The MSP pricing models will vary depending on scope, workforce size, sector, and delivery model. MSP providers will usually charge through one of three pricing models: Management fee: a percentage of total spend under management (often 1–3% of contingent workforce spend) Supplier-funded model: the MSP is funded via a small margin agreed with the agency, meaning no direct fee for the client Hybrid pricing models: a blend of client fees and supplier contributions, particularly where niche or high-demand skills are involved What’s an MSP margin? In recruitment, an MSP margin is the percentage added by a Managed Service Provider (MSP) on top of a contractor’s pay rate. It covers the MSP’s management costs and profit for overseeing the contingent workforce. For example: If a contractor earns £400 per day and the MSP charges a 15% margin, the client pays £460 per day. That £60 difference is the MSP’s margin. MSP delivery model Delivery models will also directly influence cost and supplier relationships: Master Vendor: the MSP supplies most workers directly, reducing costs but limiting supplier variety Neutral Vendor: the MSP manages a wide network of agencies, ensuring breadth of choice but often at higher supplier margins Hybrid Delivery: a tailored mix of direct fulfilment and agency supply, balancing cost efficiency with niche expertise For a deeper dive into these models and why they matter, check out our full breakdown of MSP delivery models. How much money can you save with a managed service programme? Depending on how mature their current model is, UK companies that use a recruitment MSP typically save 10–20% in the first year. Most of the time, these savings come from: Lower agency margins through managing suppliers in one place Clear reporting making it easier to see and control costs Lower risk of compliance and IR35, which means no expensive fines Better operations because of standardised processes and quicker hiring How to compare managed service provider cost models With these ten steps, you’ll be able to compare MSP costs and evaluate bids on a like-for-like basis, giving you full visibility of potential contingent workforce cost savings. 1. Start with accurate baseline data Before you think about future savings, you need to know exactly what you’re spending today. Without a reliable starting point, you can’t measure savings, compare MSP suppliers fairly, or spot inflated costs. Gather data on: Your current contingent workforce headcount Pay rates and charge rates by role Agency fees and mark-ups Statutory costs (holiday pay, NI, pension, apprenticeship levy) Screening, testing, and compliance costs Technology/VMS fees Any other pass-through costs In our experience, the most common reason an MSP cost model fails in procurement is missing or incomplete baseline data. We regularly work with clients to fill these gaps before they go to market. Ask your current MSP, Preferred Supplier List (PSL), or ad-hoc supply chain to provide this in writing. If you’re met with resistance, that’s already a red flag for your procurement cost-saving strategy. 2. Understand your contingent workforce profile Your worker population profile affects almost every pricing variable in an MSP bid. Key metrics to capture: Size of contingent workforce and active assignments Assignment duration and start dates Direct fulfilment % vs. 2nd tier suppliers (The percentage of workers hired directly by the MSP versus through other agencies). Worker source breakdown (MSP-sourced vs client-sourced/payrolled) Location and line manager Pay and statutory costs per role This detail allows you to evaluate pricing models accurately. For example, if most of your workers are payrolled rather than sourced, an MSP supplier with a lower payroll rate may be more cost-effective than one with a slightly lower sourcing rate. 3. Build the business case Once you have baseline data and workforce insights, you can start building your business case. Your MSP cost model should: Be simple enough to present to your executive board Clearly show total projected savings for each bid Allow scenario modelling, e.g., impact of different direct fulfilment rates, tenure discounts, or tech costs Example:Supplier A charges a lower direct fulfilment rate but commits to only 70% direct hires. Supplier B charges slightly more but commits to 90%. Over time, Supplier B could be more cost-effective due to reduced reliance on 2nd-tier suppliers with higher mark-ups, resulting in procurement cost savings. See this in action within our E.ON MSP partnership and explore how a direct fulfilment model can reduce reliance on second-tier suppliers, improve accountability, and deliver faster, higher-quality hiring. 4. Keep the pricing spreadsheet simple Complex spreadsheets lead to inconsistent evaluations. Procurement teams benefit most from a pricing model that captures the essentials without over-engineering. Recommended inclusions: Direct fulfilment mark-up Payroll mark-up (for client-sourced workers) Tenure-based discounts 2nd tier supplier mark-up Tech/Vendor Management System (VMS) costs (priced separately) Separating VMS costs lets you compare technology spend accurately and assess the true value of different bids. It also keeps the option open to own your own platform, giving you more flexibility and making it easier to switch MSPs in the future. 5. Clarify Mark-Up vs Margin It’s surprising how often terminology causes confusion in MSP tenders. A 7% mark-up is not the same as a 7% margin. Why? Margins cost you more. Mark-up: % added to the worker’s pay rate + statutory costs Margin: % of the total charge rate In simple terms, margins are calculated as a percentage of the total amount you pay (including fees and statutory costs) so you end up paying more than you would with the same percentage mark-up. Agree upfront on which you’re using and define exactly how it will be applied to avoid confusion and unexpected costs. 6. Common pitfalls in MSP cost modelling Even the most experienced procurement teams can run into challenges when comparing MSP bids. A few small oversights at this stage can lead to big discrepancies later, either during supplier evaluation or once delivery begins. Here are the most common pitfalls to avoid: Unclear or inconsistent pay rate assumptions Hidden tech or implementation fees Overstated migration savings Delivery model impact overlooked Overcomplicated pricing templates 7. Factor in contractual terms and migration costs Migrating workers between MSP providers can appear to deliver big upfront savings but only if your contractual terms allow it. These are important to check: Worker transfer clauses and associated fees Restrictions in existing worker contracts Realistic migration percentages Treat migration savings as a one-off line item in your MSP cost model rather than building them into your ongoing projections. This avoids creating an inflated view of savings that won’t recur year after year. Always run a separate “business as usual” cost comparison without migration savings so you can see the true long-term cost picture and make more informed procurement decisions. 8. Consider temp-to-perm and permanent hire pricing Even if your MSP engagement focuses on contingent workers, include: Temp-to-perm fees (broken down by tenure, e.g., 0–13 weeks, 13–26 weeks, 26+ weeks) Ad-hoc permanent hire fees These can become decision-making tiebreakers if two bids are otherwise close in contingent workforce cost savings. 9. Balance MSP pricing with capability Price matters, but it should never be the only deciding factor. An MSP provider that charges slightly more but delivers consistently high service quality, exceptional compliance standards, and faster time-to-hire will almost always outperform a cheaper alternative in real commercial terms. We typically see procurement teams achieve better long-term value when their procurement cost-saving strategy prioritises capability and reliability over the lowest upfront cost. A cheaper MSP who can’t deliver on speed, compliance, or quality will cost more in the long run through overtime, missed deadlines, and project delays. To ensure you’re balancing both cost savings and ability, include a technical capability evaluation alongside your cost model to ensure the supplier has the following: Talent pool depth and relevance Implementation timelines Technology fit and scalability Compliance records Our service quality consistently ranks among the best in the industry, supported by some of the highest Net Promoter Scores in the MSP market. This means our clients not only get an MSP supplier who can deliver on paper; they work with a consultative partner who will protect their brand and maintain the standards your business depends on. Check out a case study where we partnered with Northumbrian Water Group (NWG) to deliver a compliant, high-performing managed service programme with 100% fulfilment and real-time cost visibility, all while meeting strict regulatory deadlines. 10. Present your MSP cost model for decision-makers Your output should be: A clear side-by-side supplier cost comparison Highlighting contractual commitments (direct fulfilment %, tech costs, temp-to-perm fees). Linked to business case outcomes and not just line-by-line cost. Many leadership boards respond best to visual data. Converting cost models into simple charts can make savings and differences between MSP suppliers instantly clear. Final checklist for your procurement cost-saving strategies Before you finalise and sign off your MSP cost model, take a step back and make sure you have addressed every key element. This is your last opportunity to confirm that your assumptions are sound and your comparisons are fair, so your board will have all the information they need to make a confident decision. Baseline data complete and verified Workforce profile documented Mark-up vs margin clarified Tech costs separated Migration savings separated from BAU costs Temp-to-perm and permanent hire pricing included Technical evaluation criteria set A well-built MSP cost model isn’t just a procurement exercise, it’ll safeguard value over the life of your MSP contract. By combining accurate data, clear pricing comparisons, and a balanced view of capability alongside cost, you’ll be able to make confident, evidence-based decisions. Your organisation can secure an MSP partnership that delivers both contingent workforce cost savings and long-term quality. Book a cost-model review session Get a personalised review of your MSP cost model and benchmark it against industry best practice to uncover hidden savings and unlock your full potential. Read other MSP insights Explore our full library of MSP resources for procurement teams navigating MSP tenders.

By Rullion on 29 October 2025