6 Key Considerations When Changing Your MSP Provider

BLOGBy Rullion on 23 July 2025

Discover key considerations for choosing your first MSP provider and ensure you select the right partner to manage your contingent workforce effectively.

Changing your MSP provider is a significant decision that can impact the management of your contingent workforce. Whether you're unhappy with the service, nearing the end of your contract, or simply exploring other options, there are several key factors to consider before making the switch. From understanding your contract and technology needs to planning for a smooth implementation, this guide covers the crucial aspects to ensure you choose the right MSP and make the transition as seamless as possible. 

For organisations that rely heavily on a contingent workforce, selecting the right MSP provider is critical. By carefully considering these six key factors, you can minimise disruption, reduce risk, and ensure that your new MSP can support your operational goals. 

  1. Why Change Your MSP Provider? 

  1. Assessing Your Contract and Exit Clauses 

  1. Technology Considerations for Transition 

  1. Impact of Changing Your Account Team 

  1. Building a Strong Business Case for Change 

  1. Successful Implementation and Communication Strategies 

Why Change Your MSP Provider? 

Before making a change, it’s important to first understand why you’re considering switching your Managed Service Provider (MSP). Are you dissatisfied with the level of service you’re receiving? Do you find that your current MSP doesn’t provide enough flexibility or efficiency in managing your contingent workforce? 

Key questions to ask include: 

  • Are you struggling with a lack of visibility or control over workforce spend? 

  • Is your current MSP unable to deliver in terms of compliance and risk management? 

  • Do you feel that your current provider lacks access to specialised talent, leaving you with recruitment challenges? 

  • Are your workforce strategies reactive, rather than proactive? 

For example, in industries like Energy and Utilities, workforce compliance and access to skilled labour are paramount. An MSP can help streamline compliance management while providing access to a broader pool of specialised workers. Similarly, in the Transport & Rail sector, workforce scalability and cost management can be a major challenge, making an MSP a valuable solution to optimise these areas. 

Having clarity on these points will not only help you articulate what you need but also ensure that the MSP you choose is better equipped to meet your goals. If you’re unsure, it might be worth speaking to a few MSP providers to understand how their services differ and which one can meet your unique needs. 

Assessing Your Contract and Exit Clauses 

Once you’ve established why you want to make the change, it’s time to turn your attention to your current MSP contract. Thoroughly review the terms of the agreement, specifically focusing on exit clauses. A strong contract will usually have an exit management section that outlines the steps for transitioning to a new provider. 

In particular, it’s crucial to understand: 

  • The notice period required for termination 

  • The responsibilities of the current provider during the transition 

  • Whether there are any penalties or fees for early termination 

The exit process can be complicated, especially if your MSP uses proprietary technology or has specific arrangements with suppliers. Make sure you’re clear on what happens with the current workforce, especially any contingent workers who may transition to a new MSP. 

Technology Considerations for Transition 

Technology is at the heart of efficient contingent workforce management. A well-integrated Vendor Management System (VMS) can help you track performance, manage workers, and ensure compliance with regulations. However, if your current MSP is using a proprietary or heavily customised system, you may not be able to keep it when switching to a new provider. Even with third-party technology, compatibility and transition agreements should be clearly understood before making the change. 

Key Technology Considerations: 

  • Proprietary VMS: If your current MSP uses a proprietary system, confirm whether this technology can be transferred to a new provider or if you’ll need to switch to a new platform. 

  • Customisation: Some MSPs spend significant resources customising their VMS for your business. Be sure to clarify whether your new provider can retain or adapt the custom features you rely on. 

  • Integration: Make sure that any new system integrates well with your existing HR, payroll, or finance systems to ensure smooth operations during the transition. 

Switching to an MSP with an updated, more advanced system can provide improved visibility, better compliance management, and more efficient recruitment processes. But it's essential to evaluate whether this will cause disruptions or require extra training for your team. 

Additionally, ensure the technology supports real-time data and robust reporting tools, especially in sectors like Tech or Energy, where data insights drive strategic decision-making. This added visibility will enhance operational efficiency and ensure better cost control. 

Impact of Changing Your Account Team 

One aspect often overlooked when switching MSP providers is the impact on your account team. It’s easy to assume that your existing account manager or team will transition with you, but this may not always be the case. 

Understanding TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment): 
In some cases, the account team may be eligible for transfer under TUPE regulations. However, this doesn’t guarantee that the account team will remain with your new provider. They may opt to stay with your current MSP, move to another opportunity within their business, or leave the company entirely. 

It’s important to discuss this with both your outgoing and incoming MSPs so you have a clear understanding of who will be managing your account post-transition. An experienced team that knows your business can smooth the transition and provide continuity. 

Building a Strong Business Case for Change 

Switching MSP providers is a significant move, so it’s crucial to build a strong business case before taking the plunge. Engaging all key stakeholders in the process - from procurement and HR to finance and operations - is essential to ensuring that everyone is on board. 

When building your case, consider: 

  • Stakeholder feedback: Gather insights from teams who interact with the MSP regularly to understand what’s working well and what isn’t. 

  • Clear goals: Set clear objectives for what you want from a new MSP, such as better compliance, improved cost management, or access to a wider talent pool. 

  • Cost-benefit analysis: Weigh the costs of switching providers (such as transition expenses, implementation, and potential downtime) against the long-term benefits that a new MSP could provide. 

Involving all relevant teams early on ensures that everyone has a say and helps mitigate resistance to change down the line. A collaborative approach leads to a more effective transition and a smoother process overall. 

Successful Implementation and Communication Strategies 

Successful implementation requires careful planning and coordination across multiple stakeholders. The first step is to define clear roles and responsibilities, ensuring that everyone understands what is expected during the transition. 

Key factors to consider: 

  • Stakeholder involvement: Identify key individuals who will be responsible for managing the transition, such as project managers or team leads from HR, procurement, finance, and IT. 

  • Clear communication plan: A detailed communication strategy is vital to keeping all stakeholders informed about the progress of the transition. This includes informing your hiring managers, contingent workforce, and internal staff about the changes. 

  • Regular updates: Set up regular implementation meetings and establish a steering group to oversee the transition process, ensuring that issues are addressed promptly and that everyone is aligned on the timeline. 

Business Continuity

At Rullion, we prioritise business continuity during transitions. Through careful planning and project management, we ensure that operations remain smooth with minimal disruption. Any potential risks are addressed proactively, ensuring that your business remains on track throughout the transition process. 

Effective communication helps to minimise disruptions and ensures that all parties are prepared for the change. Additionally, by communicating early and often, you’ll reduce the risk of uncertainty and dissatisfaction among your workers. 

Conclusion

Changing your MSP provider doesn’t need to be a painful process if approached with careful planning and thoughtful consideration. By taking the time to assess your reasons for making the change, reviewing your contract, evaluating technology needs, and ensuring proper stakeholder engagement, you can ensure a smoother transition that benefits your organisation in the long run. 

If you're ready to explore how Rullion’s MSP services can support your business, visit our MSP solution page or book a discovery call with one of our consultants today. 

Share

Unlock your full potential.

Tell us what's holding you back, and we'll design a solution specifically for you

More like this

Choosing the Right for MSP Delivery Model Your Critical Infrastructure Projects

Choosing the Right for MSP Delivery Model Your Critical Infrastructure Projects

Why the MSP delivery model matters Your MSP delivery model shapes: Speed – how quickly roles are filled Quality – how well candidates match your requirements Access to talent – how broad or targeted your sourcing is Supplier relationships – how performance is managed Compliance and control – how you meet sector-specific regulations Two of the most widely used MSP vendor models are Master Vendor and Neutral Vendor. Some organisations also use Hybrid approaches. The right choice depends on your skill mix, supply chain maturity, and delivery priorities. Where MSP delivery models overlap No matter which model you choose, your MSP provider should still: Manage the end-to-end process for recruiting and managing contingent workers Act as a single point of contact for hiring managers and procurement Oversee supplier performance, contracts, and regulatory compliance Provide clear reporting, insight, and market intelligence Drive cost control, risk management, and continuous improvement What’s the difference between Master Vendor and Neutral Vendor? The key difference lies in candidate sourcing and supplier prioritisation: Master Vendor: in-scope roles start with the primary supplier’s own network before engaging others Neutral Vendor: opens every role to the full supplier network from day one Master Vendor MSP In a Master Vendor model, your MSP service provider is led by a single primary supplier who fills most requirements (between 60-90%) from their own talent network. When they can’t fill a role, it’s passed to a small group of approved third-party suppliers. When does a Master Vendor MSP works best? High volume of similar roles with quick turnaround times Predictable, repeat skillsets that benefit from direct fulfilment When your primary supplier has deep expertise of your sector and is able to deliver direct fulfilment on in-scope roles Example: A utilities contractor ramping up for a national smart meter installation programme or an energy provider hiring engineers for planned maintenance. Advantages of a Master Vendor model: Faster fulfilment for repeat roles Consistent quality from a supplier that knows your business Streamlined supplier management Risks to manage with a Master Vendor model: Success relies heavily on the strength and sector expertise of the primary supplier’s own network. While a Master Vendor will still work with trusted third-party suppliers for specialist roles, access to ultra-rare or emerging skill sets may still be more limited than in a Neutral Vendor model. Neutral Vendor MSP In a Neutral Vendor model, your MSP service provider acts as an impartial manager. Still overseeing all supplier relationships, enforcing performance standards, and ensuring compliance, but without prioritising its own candidates. All approved suppliers get the same opportunity to submit candidates for each role, creating a level playing field. When does a Neutral Vendor MSP works best? Roles require niche, scarce, or highly specialised skills Broader supplier reach is needed for complex projects Example: A nuclear operator hiring safety case engineers, or a water company recruiting hydrologists and digital infrastructure experts. Advantages of a Neutral Vendor model: Greater reach into niche skill markets Competitive sourcing that can balance speed, cost, and quality Less reliance on a single supplier Risks to manage with a Neutral Vendor model: Potentially slower fulfilment if processes aren’t tightly managed More complex supplier relationship management Hybrid MSP models A Hybrid MSP delivery model blends elements of Master Vendor and Neutral Vendor models to create a more flexible delivery approach. It’s designed to give you the speed and simplicity of direct fulfilment for common roles, while also tapping into a wider supplier network for specialist needs. When does a hybrid MSP vendor model work best? You have a core set of high-volume, repeat roles alongside niche, low-volume requirements. Supply chain maturity varies. Some skill areas are well covered; others need broader reach. Project demand is uneven, with peaks for specific skill sets at certain times. How a hybrid model works in practice: Master Vendor mode for operational or technical roles where the primary MSP supplier already has strong talent pipelines. Neutral Vendor mode for specialist, rare, or project-specific skills where a wider net is needed. Example: A national energy provider may use a Master Vendor approach for meter engineers, field service technicians, and project managers but switch to Neutral Vendor sourcing for cybersecurity experts or nuclear safety specialists. Advantages of a hybrid MSP model: You get the best of both worlds. Fast fulfilment for common roles, wide access for niche needs. Tailored sourcing strategy for each skill area. Can evolve over time as project needs change. Risks to manage with a hybrid model: Requires clear governance and role categorisation so suppliers know when each model applies. More complex performance tracking to ensure both streams are delivering against targets. Master Vendor MSP vs. Neutral Vendor MSP Considerations Master Vendor Model Neutral Vendor Model Speed Faster fulfilment for repeat skills Dependent on supplier responsiveness Access to niche skills Relies on primary supplier’s expertise for in-scope roles and escalation to approved suppliers Immediate access to full approved suppliernetwork Supplier relationship management One dedicated MSP contact managing a smaller, focused supplier group One dedicated MSP contact managing a broader supplier network, ensuring performance, compliance, and consistency across all vendors Cost control Strong for repeat hires Competitive supplier engagement may reduce agency rates Risk Over-reliance on one supplier Possible slower time-to-fill if not managed well Choosing the right MSP model and provider The right MSP delivery model will depend on your current skills mix, supply chain maturity, and delivery priorities. But it shouldn’t stay static; if it does, it could be time to change your MSP provider. Rullion’s MSP model helps organisations evolve their approach over time. Whether that means starting with a Master Vendor model for speed and control, moving toward a Neutral Vendor model to widen reach, or blending the two in a hybrid model. Whatever your challenges, we’ll design and manage a model that supports your projects, meets your regulatory commitments, and strengthens your long-term workforce strategy. With our deep sector expertise and enhanced internal capability, we’re able to achieve industry-leading direct fulfilment rates for our clients, delivering around 90% of roles directly through Master Vendor or hybrid arrangements. For the few highly specialised requirements that fall outside this, we draw on our trusted, vetted supplier network to ensure every role is filled with the right talent. Quick Checklist When it comes to picking the right MSP delivery model, you’ll want to ask yourself: Do we have a high volume of repeat roles or a wide mix of niche skills? How mature and capable is our current supply chain? Is speed or breadth of access our higher priority? How important is competitive supplier engagement to our hiring strategy? Are we prepared for the governance needed to manage multiple suppliers?

By Rullion on 13 August 2025

The ROI of Building Talent Internally

The ROI of Building Talent Internally

A Train to Deploy strategy offers a smarter, more sustainable way forward. Cost reduction, accelerated readiness, and a workforce designed to meet both today’s demands and tomorrow’s opportunities. Often referred to as a Hire Train Deploy model or Recruit Train Deploy strategy, Train to Deploy (TTD) is a workforce transformation solution that combines bespoke training with targeted deployment. It enables you to source talent based on behaviours and potential, then develop the technical skills your business needs. It’s a scalable workforce solution that delivers tangible ROI and long-term resilience. 1. Direct Cost Savings Lower recruitment spend You invest in readiness, not agency margins. External hiring often comes with hefty costs, agency fees, advertising, multiple interviews, onboarding, and more. And when those hires don’t stick, the cycle starts all over again. TTD reduces recruitment spend and reactive hiring by creating a pipeline of pre-trained, aligned talent. Spend shifts away from repetition and toward lasting capability. Reduced contractor reliance Reduce your dependency on high-cost, short-term fixes. A Train to Deploy strategy lets you build a pipeline of job-ready talent that meets your real-world operational needs. You’re able to scale back short-term or high-cost contingent labour and build talent capacity internally. This gives you more financial flexibility and control over your workforce model. Higher retention rates Investing in the right foundation leads to better long-term outcomes. When candidates are trained specifically for your roles, systems, and culture, they stay longer. With TTD, training is front-loaded and role-specific. People arrive more confident, capable, and connected to your purpose. That leads to lower attrition, less churn, and reduced hiring costs over time. 2. Value Beyond the Bottom Line Faster onboarding, faster productivity One of the biggest hidden costs in recruitment is lost time: the two-month ramp-up, the slow integration, the inconsistent onboarding. Our Train to Deploy solution shortens that curve. With role-specific onboarding delivered in advance, new hires contribute faster, helping you unlock value from day one. Inclusive hiring, by design Traditional hiring filters often exclude great candidates who don’t match a perfect CV. TTD is built around a behaviour-first approach. If someone has the right mindset and potential, Rullion helps develop the skillset, regardless of background, career history, or qualifications. We call it inclusion without limits. And it helps organisations build community-reflective, inclusive talent pipelines that improve DEI metrics and culture, without compromising on quality or readiness. Higher engagement and performance When people feel prepared, supported, and set up for success, they thrive. X helps turn every new hire into a high-potential one. By nurturing confidence early and delivering job-specific training up front, it supports stronger retention, better collaboration, and more engaged, high-performing teams. That means better value per headcount and a stronger culture. 3. Future-Proofing the Workforce Building skills before you need them Whether you’re preparing for an infrastructure expansion, facing a retirement cliff, or adopting new technologies, a Train to Deploy solution helps you build skills in advance. By aligning talent development to your strategic goals, you’re never caught short when demand shifts. It’s one of the key benefits of Train to Deploy, enabling you to grow capability at pace with opportunity. Built-in resilience Organisations that build from within are better equipped to handle evolving industry or project landscapes. A Train to Deploy model gives you the agility to scale teams, adopt new technologies, or respond to regulatory shifts. With a workforce already trained and aligned. The ROI of Train to Deploy is beyond just pounds saved; it’s in adaptability gained. Institutional knowledge transfer By redeploying contractors or training new hires to shadow outgoing specialists, a Train to Deploy framework helps retain hard-won expertise that might otherwise walk out the door. This workforce transformation strategy makes sure knowledge transfer is captured through structured training and handovers. It protects institutional knowledge, safeguards IP, and ensures continuity during transitions. The ROI Goes Deeper Than Cost Yes, Train to Deploy delivers tangible cost savings. It also transforms how your organisation functions. This long-term workforce transformation is where the true ROI of Train to Deploy is realised: in cost, capability, and culture. When you invest in internal capability, you don’t just plug gaps. You shift from reactive hiring to future-fit teams. You create a workforce that reflects where your business is today and where it’s going. Want to see how Train to Deploy could deliver ROI for your organisation? Download the Train to Deploy Toolkit or visit our Train to Deploy solution page to explore how this strategic workforce solution can help you get work done. Ready to quantify the ROI of building talent from within? Book a discovery call with one of our consultants.

By Rullion on 12 August 2025

NEWS
Rullion Shortlisted for TIARA 2025 for MSP Client Service

Rullion Shortlisted for TIARA 2025 for MSP Client Service

Helping E.ON Scale Under Pressure At the start of 2024, E.ON was under pressure to hire quickly. Major infrastructure projects were ramping up, and the available talent pool was shrinking, especially for their hard-to-fill technical roles. We’d already built a strong foundation through our MSP, but this new challenge needed a step change. So, we moved fast to deliver a more agile MSP client service model without compromising on quality or compliance required for the energy sector. We delivered a client-first, values-led approach through a fully embedded team structure. Tracy Hands (Client Services Director), Sinéad Scott (Client Services Manager), and the rest of our incredible E.ON account team were on hand to provide a seamless, proactive experience for E.ON’s hiring managers. Across this new phase, we: Embedded new AI-driven sourcing tools Introduced a Train to Deploy pipeline to tackle emerging skills gaps Maintained 100% onboarding accuracy Reduced time-to-hire by 15% Improved interview-to-offer success by 25% Achieved an NPS of +60 from hiring managers “Rullion have been a trusted MSP partner to E.ON for over a decade. Their team consistently delivers exceptional service, going above and beyond to adapt to our evolving needs. Their commitment to diversity, innovation and doing the right thing sets them apart from other providers.” – E.ON Talent Acquisition Lead Empowering Our People to Empower Our Clients Behind every successful client experience is a team that knows the business inside out. At Rullion, we make sure our people are supported, upskilled, and empowered to make a real impact (not just fill roles). We invest in our people through: Modular training in DE&I, compliance, supply chain, and analytics Career progression pathways An inclusive, knowledge-sharing culture Many of our consultants have been with us for over six years, bringing consistency, deep insight, and trusted MSP client service to organisations like E.ON. It’s a reflection of one of our guiding principles: Happy People, Happy Customers. With an employee engagement score of 91% and internal retention in the high 80s, we know that when our team feels supported and confident, our clients feel it too. “Working on the Rullion-E.ON MSP account is incredibly rewarding. We’re empowered to make decisions, improve processes, and build real relationships with the client.” – Senior MSP Consultant, Rullion A Client Experience Designed for Impact Over the course of our partnership with E.ON, we’ve delivered consistently; more importantly, we’ve adapted. Together, we’ve improved fulfilment, sped up hiring, and brought new, diverse talent into the business through a more inclusive supply chain. Our partnership has led to: 100% fulfilment across core roles 40% reduction in average time-to-hire 97% client satisfaction score 12% increase in contractor retention year-on-year Client Service With Purpose At Rullion, we believe workforce partnerships are a vehicle for positive change. Through our E.ON MSP client service, we’ve supported career pathways for under-represented groups and engaged over 10 specialist diverse suppliers to align hiring strategies to sustainability and social value goals. Our team regularly runs employability sessions to support job seekers and helps to shape equitable hiring practices during the cost-of-living crisis. It's this people-first mindset that shapes how we work. Workforce Solutions Provider for Critical Infrastructure Organisations As a business, our aim is to do more than just help organisations hire. We want to help organisations grow equitably and sustainably. This TIARA shortlisting reflects the kind of client relationships we aim to build: long-term, collaborative, and rooted in shared purpose. We’re here to solve those complex hiring problems, drive innovation, and help our clients succeed today and into the future.

By Rullion on 08 August 2025