How to Choose Your Very First MSP Provider

BLOGBy Rullion on 28 July 2025

Choosing your first MSP provider is a strategic move that can transform how your business manages its contingent workforce. 

For industries like utilities, energy, transport, and nuclear, where compliance, safety, and continuity are non-negotiable, selecting the right Managed Service Provider (MSP) is a significant milestone. And if you’re doing it for the first time, the stakes - and learning curve - are even higher. 

This guide will walk you through everything you need to consider when choosing your first MSP provider, from evaluating your business needs to managing change across your teams. 

Why You Need an MSP Provider 

By outsourcing your contingent workforce to an experienced MSP service provider, you benefit from: 

  • Streamlined supplier management 

  • Enhanced workforce visibility and data insight 

  • Improved speed and quality of hire 

  • Compliance with legal, tax, and regulatory requirements 

  • Centralised billing and reporting 

An MSP provider offers more than just cost savings. A good one becomes an extension of your business: improving visibility, standardising processes, ensuring compliance, and giving you better control over your contingent workforce management. 

These advantages are particularly valuable in critical infrastructure, where agility coexists with rigorous governance. 

7 Key Considerations When Choosing an MSP Provider 

1. Understand Your Business Needs 

Before speaking to any providers, clarify what you want from your MSP. Is it workforce visibility? Faster hiring? Scalability? Reduced risk? 

Define your goals so you can assess how well each provider’s MSP solutions align with your strategic objectives. 

2. Look for Industry Experience 

A first-time MSP implementation requires guidance from experts, especially in highly regulated industries. 

Choose a provider that has experience running an MSP for critical infrastructure organisations. Ask for case studies that demonstrate their ability to transition businesses like yours from fragmented PSL (Preferred Supplier List) models to full MSP services. 

3. Assess Their Implementation Plan 

Your first MSP implementation will involve a significant change: from a multi-supplier model to a single-source solution. That means your MSP provider must have a clear, realistic, and collaborative implementation plan. 

  • Do their timelines make sense? 

  • How much support will they need from your internal teams? 

  • Will they take the lead in planning, onboarding, and change management? 

Make sure their plan reflects your status as a first-time MSP adopter. You’ll likely need more time, more support, and more communication than a company switching from one MSP to another. 

4. Evaluate Technology Capabilities 

A key part of any MSP solution is the Vendor Management System (VMS): a platform that centralises the engagement and management of your contingent workforce. 

Ask: 

  • Will the provider guide the setup of workflows and approval chains? 

  • Will they challenge overcomplex processes that could hinder productivity? 

  • Do they have experience advising businesses that are new to VMS platforms? 

Going live with a simple, scalable solution is often better than launching with an overengineered system. 

5. Prioritise Communication and Support 

First-time MSP adoption affects hiring managers, finance, HR, and agency workers alike. Look for an MSP provider that: 

  • Is highly visible during rollout 

  • Assigns named contacts to key hiring sites 

  • Holds onboarding workshops and meets hiring managers in person 

  • Builds trust with existing contingent workers 

A well-planned communication strategy can prevent resistance, reduce confusion, and speed up adoption. 

6. Review Cultural Fit 

This change is about more than systems and workflows; it’s about people. Ask yourself: 

  • Do their team members speak your language? 

  • Can they build relationships with your hiring managers? 

  • Will they integrate well with your teams? 

Cultural alignment helps ensure your chosen MSP becomes a trusted partner, not just a transactional supplier. 

7. Consider Cost, But Prioritise Value 

Yes, cost matters. But focusing solely on price can lead to poor decisions, especially during your first MSP implementation. 

Choose a provider that delivers real value: long-term savings, improved compliance, and enhanced business agility. These are the outcomes that matter most. 

How to Evaluate MSP Providers 

When selecting your first MSP service provider, due diligence is critical. Ask for: 

  • Real case studies of first-time MSP implementations 

  • Testimonials from businesses in similar sectors 

  • Detailed implementation timelines and resource plans 

  • Clarity on how they’ll handle existing supplier transitions 

  • Examples of when they’ve challenged client requests to ensure better operational outcomes 

Look for a supplier who won’t just say "yes" to everything but will advise you honestly, even when it’s uncomfortable. 

What to Expect During Your Onboarding Process 

Your MSP should shoulder the heavy lifting - especially during a first-generation implementation - and ensure every stakeholder is supported. Your onboarding journey may include: 

  • Contract and supply chain review 

  • VMS implementation 

  • Worker and supplier migration 

  • Hiring manager training 

  • Ongoing support from a dedicated account team 

Common Pitfalls to Avoid 

When choosing your first MSP provider, avoid these common mistakes: 

  • Focusing only on price: value beats cost in the long run. 

  • Not asking enough questions: challenge their assumptions and implementation plans. 

  • Underestimating the learning curve: first-time implementations are resource intensive. 

  • Skipping cultural fit: the right team fit can make or break the rollout. 

  • Neglecting internal stakeholders: bring operations, finance, HR, and hiring managers into the evaluation process early. 

Conclusion: Choosing the Right MSP is Choosing a Partner 

The first step in any major change is the hardest, but it’s also the most rewarding. Choosing your first MSP Service Provider is a big decision, but with the right approach, you’ll gain a partner who helps you manage risk, drive efficiencies, and build a more agile, future-ready workforce. 

Whether you're in energy, transport, utilities, or nuclear, your first MSP experience can set the tone for the next decade of your workforce management strategy. 

Share
Ready to Take the First Step?

We’ve helped numerous organisations in critical infrastructure implement their first MSP solution successfully, smoothly, and with long-term results. 
 
Explore Rullion’s MSP solutions or schedule a discovery call with one of our experts today. 

More like this

Nuclear Workforce Planning in 2026

Nuclear Workforce Planning in 2026

The UK’s nuclear sector is moving into 2026 with clear momentum. By September 2025, UK civil nuclear employment had reached just under 100,000 roles, a record high. Growth is being driven by a wider mix of programmes than many people assume. It’s not only large-scale new builds; it’s also fleet operations, defuelling, decommissioning, supply chain activity, and emerging delivery models like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) beginning to shape future nuclear workforce planning. At the same time, government direction is becoming clearer. The UK’s long-term nuclear sector plan is increasingly defined through national roadmapping and policy signalling with an emphasis on sustained nuclear capability through to 2050. And that has implications for how workforce strategy is shaped in 2026. Delve into (and jump to): Why 2026 is a turning point for workforce planning in the nuclear sector One sector, very different workforce needs The skills shaping nuclear hiring in 2026 Where nuclear workforce planning breaks down What better nuclear workforce planning looks like in practice What major programmes are signalling in 2026 Why 2026 is a turning point for workforce planning in the nuclear sector The nuclear workforce challenge is often described as a shortage issue. In reality, the pressure points in 2026 are more specific and more operational. This year sits at the intersection of several competing demands: Major new build delivery continuing at scale (including Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C) Sustained demand across the existing nuclear fleet, including operations and nuclear life extension planning Long-term decommissioning and waste management programmes continuing nationally Rising expectations around safety, quality, assurance, and regulatory compliance Growing demand for digitally enabled engineering and delivery capability Increased attention on the workforce implications of SMRs, including the shift toward repeatability and standardised delivery models In 2026, the same skill sets are being pulled in multiple directions at once: across different sites, delivery stages, and risk environments. The result is a more competitive hiring landscape, leading to longer lead times for scarce capability and higher consequences when workforce planning is reactive. One sector, very different workforce needs “Nuclear recruitment” is often treated as one market. Where in actuality, it’s several markets layered together, and the differences matter. Workforce requirements shift dramatically depending on where a programme sits in the lifecycle: New build delivery Ongoing operations Life extension activity Defueling and decommissioning Emerging delivery models like SMRs Each stage behaves differently in terms of supply, scarcity, onboarding time, and compliance requirements. Design & Engineering Design and early engineering work tend to rely heavily on: Systems and discipline engineering (mechanical, electrical, C&I) Safety case and assurance capability Governance, documentation, and regulatory awareness This is also where “transferable skills” can genuinely work. But only when expectations are set properly. Nuclear environments reward structured thinking, documentation quality, and delivery discipline as much as technical capability. This is increasingly relevant as SMR conversations mature. While the delivery model differs from large-scale builds, the fundamentals remain consistent: nuclear-grade quality mixed with engineering rigour and configuration control. Construction & Commissioning Nuclear workforce growth becomes most visible and most pressured here. In 2026, what becomes most challenging has more to do with readiness than availability. Projects don’t simply need people who can do the work. They need people who can deliver at pace to nuclear standards, within nuclear governance. Early workforce planning here is what can prevent project bottlenecks later. Construction and commissioning typically demand: High-volume site delivery capability Strong quality culture (inspection, welding, fabrication, assurance) Commissioning expertise aligned to safety and compliance expectations Logistics, HSE leadership, and interface management Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Operations is where nuclear becomes long-term. This is also where nuclear life extension activity becomes a real workforce driver in its own right. Extending the operating life of existing stations relies on retained knowledge and stable capability, and not just recruitment volume. These roles depend on: Reliability and asset performance expertise Maintenance planning and outage delivery Compliance, governance, and leadership maturity Deep site knowledge and consistency Decommissioning & Waste Management Decommissioning is sometimes underweighted in workforce conversations, despite being one of the most sustained drivers of UK nuclear employment. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s (NDA) Draft Business Plan 2026–29 (published December 2025) reinforces decommissioning as a long-duration national programme, with ongoing workforce requirements across dismantling, waste handling, remediation, and programme leadership. This work is often less visible than new builds, but it remains essential to the credibility and delivery of the UK’s wider nuclear programme. Check out our interview with Deep Fission’s CEO, Liz Muller, on rethinking nuclear waste management. The skills shaping nuclear hiring in 2026 Demand in nuclear workforce planning isn’t only about headcount. It’s about the right capability, in the right place, at the right time, delivered to the right nuclear standards. As we move through 2026, pressure remains high in areas such as: Electrical engineering and C&I Systems integration and commissioning Quality, inspection, and assurance Safety case and regulatory-aligned delivery roles Project controls (planning, cost engineering, scheduling) Construction management and interface coordination Digital capability (safety, configuration control, performance) What’s notable in 2026 is that these skills are needed across multiple programme types at once. Across the lifecycle, one theme remains consistent: technical skill matters, but so does the ability to operate inside nuclear governance, with process discipline, documentation quality, and assurance expectations playing a key part of the job. Where nuclear workforce planning breaks down Even with all this nuclear sector growth, one of the biggest friction points is the gap between nuclear talent having the right technical background and being fully ready for nuclear delivery environments. That “missing middle” tends to show up in areas like: Project-readiness and site-readiness Compliance and assurance expectations Safety culture alignment Documentation standards and quality processes Geography adds another layer. Large programmes require both regional workforce development and national mobilisation. Without both, pressure builds quickly in local markets. This is why early workforce activity matters. Early shaping of pipelines leads to early team stabilisation and less reactive delivery, especially when multiple programmes are driving demand simultaneously. This is where an abundance mindset matters most. The constraint isn’t that talent doesn’t exist. It’s that readiness is uneven and pathways into nuclear delivery remain too narrow. When organisations invest early in conversion, onboarding and nuclear-grade standards, capacity expands quickly. When they don’t, scarcity feels permanent. “The challenge in nuclear isn’t a lack of people. It’s that capability is arriving at different levels of readiness, at different times, across different programmes. Workforce planning is about aligning that, not just filling roles.”— James Chamberlain, Nuclear, Sector Director, Rullion What better nuclear workforce planning looks like The most effective workforce strategies in 2026 share a few key traits: Plan by lifecycle phase, not just job titles Nuclear delivery depends on sequencing. Workforce planning needs to follow the demand curve across the lifecycle and not just the current open vacancy list. This forward planning can noticeably start to reduce risk: Clearer lead times Better mobilisation Fewer last-minute compromises on quality or readiness Build structured routes for scarce and transferable capability The sector can’t rely only on nuclear-experienced talent. But “transferable” doesn’t mean instant. Transitions work best when there is clear structure around: Expectations and standards Onboarding and compliance readiness Progression pathways once inside the sector Where skills are transferable but nuclear readiness takes time, Train to Deploy helps build job-ready nuclear talent by combining targeted training with your delivery standards, so people arrive ready to contribute from day one. Invest in early careers with conversion in mind The National Nuclear Strategic Plan for Skills includes commitments to scale early career routes, including the ambition to double apprentices entering the nuclear workforce by academic year 2025/26, with 2,500+ apprentices joining the nuclear workforce in 2024/25. The differentiator is what happens after entry: development pathways, retention, and long-term capability building. Treat workforce as delivery risk management In critical infrastructure, workforce constraints don’t only slow hiring. They affect commissioning timelines, quality performance, and programme confidence. This becomes even more important when the sector is balancing large-scale builds, fleet operations, life extensions, decommissioning delivery, and next-generation programme development such as SMRs. “You can’t separate workforce planning from mobilisation. If screening, onboarding, and readiness aren’t designed for scale, the workforce exists on paper but not on site.” — Jayne Lee, Head of Candidate Services, Rullion What major programmes are signalling in 2026 Sizewell C is a strong example of early workforce momentum, and it sits within a wider landscape that includes major delivery demand at Hinkley Point C and sustained activity across operational and decommissioning sites. In the last month, Sizewell C has reported: Around 2,000 workers onsite More than 100 apprentices appointed Around £3bn in contracts awarded to 400+ UK suppliers Continued regional supply chain mobilisation Early pipeline activity is already shaping workforce readiness, long before peak construction demand. This is the direction the wider market is moving in: earlier engagement, clearer forecasting, and more structured talent strategies across delivery phases. The nuclear hiring landscape in 2026 2026 will continue to be a strong year for the UK nuclear sector, but it will also be a demanding one. The organisations that deliver best will be those that approach nuclear workforce planning as a core part of programme execution: Anticipating scarcity early Building structured pipelines Protecting delivery confidence through quality and readiness Creating workforce models that can scale across multiple sites and phases

By Rullion on 04 February 2026