From Yellow Pages to Digital ID: the Future of Screening

BLOGBy Rullion on 06 October 2025

In this edition of Confessions of a Screening Expert, Phil Bel, Candidate Services Team Leader at Rullion, shares how background screening services have evolved from paper packs to digital-first Background Screening. He explains why human support still matters in DBS checks, Right to Work checks, and employment reference checks - and why innovations like rapid verification could transform the future of candidate screening. 

From Yellow Pages packs to digital-first 

Step into the office of a background screener in 2014 and you’d see a very different world. Printers churning non-stop, fax machines whirring, and stacks of paper files piled high on desks. 

“When I started, the screening packs were as thick as the Yellow Pages,” recalls Phil Bell, Candidate Services Team Leader at Rullion. “Printers were constantly running, scanners were working overtime, and every single page had to be put in the right order for approval. Then you’d have to scan the whole lot again, convert it into a PDF, and email it across. And still keep the hard copies in case of audit.” 

It was slow and manual labour. Fast forward a decade, and most pre-employment screening journeys are now completed digitally through secure portals. But as Phil suggests, just because you can automate, doesn’t always mean you should. 

Why not everything should be automated 

Automation has streamlined many tasks in background screening services, but over-reliance can backfire. For tasks like Right to Work checks and DBS checks, automation speeds things up. But when it comes to employment reference checks, removing people from the process often slows things down instead of speeding them up. 

“Sometimes a phone call is better than another email,” Phil says. “If I call a referee, I can explain what we need, answer their questions, and build a connection. A single conversation can cut through weeks of delay.” 

The lesson? Automation should support, not replace, human judgement. Referees and candidates value clarity and reassurance, and that’s not something a chaser email can deliver. 

The promise of rapid employment verification 

One that stands out for him is rapid employment verification: a tool that connects directly to HMRC, payroll, and open banking records (with candidate consent). 

“Instead of spending weeks chasing down referees, the system can instantly verify where someone has worked and for how long,” Phil explains. “That cuts out admin, reduces errors, and gets candidates cleared much quicker.” 

The benefits are clear: 

  • Faster onboarding for clients in time-critical projects. 

  • Less frustration for candidates who just want to start work. 

  • Efficiency gains for screening teams, freeing up time to focus on problem cases. 

But Phil is also realistic about the challenges. Consent will always be critical, candidates must feel comfortable with how their data is being used, and clients need to be ready to embrace the technology. Until both sides are confident, adoption will remain limited. 
 
Still, as improvements are rolled out, Phil believes rapid verification has the potential to transform how employment reference checks are managed, cutting down on delays and eliminating much of the manual chasing that slows the process today. This echoes what we’ve seen first-hand on major projects like Hinkley Point C where speed and compliance must go hand in hand. Read more in How Rullion Delivers Screening Success at Hinkley Point C. 

Smarter, not colder: the role of AI 

Phil also sees a clear role for artificial intelligence in pre-employment screening. For him, it’s not about replacing people but about making processes more reliable. At present, portals depend on candidates entering every detail correctly - but even something as small as a mistyped referee email address can cause the whole process to grind to a halt. 

This is where AI could add real value. Smart systems could flag incorrect information at the point of entry, ask intelligent follow-up questions, or even validate data against public sources. By catching errors early, the process becomes smoother for candidates, referees, and clients alike. 

Phil sums it up: “AI won’t replace advisors, but it can help us eliminate mistakes earlier and get people cleared faster. It’s about making the process smarter, not colder.” 

From science fiction to reality: digital ID 

When asked whether screening could ever become instantaneous, with each person carrying a unique identifier, like a cryptocurrency token - Phil admits it once felt like science fiction.  

Yet within a short amount of time of this interview, the UK Government announced its plans for digital ID cards, bringing the concept closer to reality. Across Europe, adoption is already well underway: Estonia’s e-ID has been in place for nearly 20 years, saving citizens an average of five working days each year, while Denmark’s MitID is now used by over 90% of the population. The EU has also committed to launching a Digital Identity Wallet by 2026, giving all citizens a secure, standardised way to prove who they are. 

He reflects: “Every worker already has a National Insurance number, and government gateways already give access to some records. So, a seamless digital ID isn’t as far-fetched as it sounds.” 

These global examples show that the debate is no longer about whether digital ID will arrive, but how it will be implemented and trusted. Linking records into a universal digital identity system could drastically reduce the time and effort involved in screening. Done well, it would give candidates more control over their information and employers greater confidence in its accuracy. 

Action points for employers 

Phil’s reflections don’t just highlight how far the industry has come, they also point to practical steps organisations can take now: 

  • Audit your processes: Identify where automation helps and where it hinders. For tasks like Right to Work checks and DBS checks, automation saves time; for references, human contact may still be best. 

  • Prepare for rapid verification: Start conversations with candidates about consent and data-sharing, so you’re ready to adopt new tools quickly. 

  • Invest in data quality: Choose systems that help catch errors early and reduce reliance on manual corrections. 

  • Keep the human touch: Balance is key. A process that relies entirely on automation risks losing candidates, but too much manual intervention creates delays. Getting this mix right is what keeps projects moving. 

Why balance wins 

Phil’s perspective is clear: the future of screening isn’t about choosing between people and technology but combining both. Tools like rapid employment verification and AI will undoubtedly shape the industry, but they work best when paired with real advisors who understand the needs of candidates and clients. 

“At the end of the day, candidates just want to get cleared quickly so they can start work. Clients want the same: people on site as soon as possible,” he says. “By blending technology with genuine human support, we can deliver speed, compliance, and a better experience for everyone.” 

It’s this combination, smart automation with real human guidance, that defines Rullion’s approach to background screening services. It means clients in critical infrastructure sectors like nuclear, transport and rail, and utilities can get the best of both worlds: the speed of automation with the reassurance of people who care. 

Share
Need background screening that balances speed with support?

Rullion’s proven background screening services combine smart technology with dedicated advisors to deliver fast, compliant results across critical infrastructure sectors like nuclear, transport and rail, and utilities.

More like this

Nuclear Workforce Planning in 2026

Nuclear Workforce Planning in 2026

The UK’s nuclear sector is moving into 2026 with clear momentum. By September 2025, UK civil nuclear employment had reached just under 100,000 roles, a record high. Growth is being driven by a wider mix of programmes than many people assume. It’s not only large-scale new builds; it’s also fleet operations, defuelling, decommissioning, supply chain activity, and emerging delivery models like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) beginning to shape future nuclear workforce planning. At the same time, government direction is becoming clearer. The UK’s long-term nuclear sector plan is increasingly defined through national roadmapping and policy signalling with an emphasis on sustained nuclear capability through to 2050. And that has implications for how workforce strategy is shaped in 2026. Delve into (and jump to): Why 2026 is a turning point for workforce planning in the nuclear sector One sector, very different workforce needs The skills shaping nuclear hiring in 2026 Where nuclear workforce planning breaks down What better nuclear workforce planning looks like in practice What major programmes are signalling in 2026 Why 2026 is a turning point for workforce planning in the nuclear sector The nuclear workforce challenge is often described as a shortage issue. In reality, the pressure points in 2026 are more specific and more operational. This year sits at the intersection of several competing demands: Major new build delivery continuing at scale (including Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C) Sustained demand across the existing nuclear fleet, including operations and nuclear life extension planning Long-term decommissioning and waste management programmes continuing nationally Rising expectations around safety, quality, assurance, and regulatory compliance Growing demand for digitally enabled engineering and delivery capability Increased attention on the workforce implications of SMRs, including the shift toward repeatability and standardised delivery models In 2026, the same skill sets are being pulled in multiple directions at once: across different sites, delivery stages, and risk environments. The result is a more competitive hiring landscape, leading to longer lead times for scarce capability and higher consequences when workforce planning is reactive. One sector, very different workforce needs “Nuclear recruitment” is often treated as one market. Where in actuality, it’s several markets layered together, and the differences matter. Workforce requirements shift dramatically depending on where a programme sits in the lifecycle: New build delivery Ongoing operations Life extension activity Defueling and decommissioning Emerging delivery models like SMRs Each stage behaves differently in terms of supply, scarcity, onboarding time, and compliance requirements. Design & Engineering Design and early engineering work tend to rely heavily on: Systems and discipline engineering (mechanical, electrical, C&I) Safety case and assurance capability Governance, documentation, and regulatory awareness This is also where “transferable skills” can genuinely work. But only when expectations are set properly. Nuclear environments reward structured thinking, documentation quality, and delivery discipline as much as technical capability. This is increasingly relevant as SMR conversations mature. While the delivery model differs from large-scale builds, the fundamentals remain consistent: nuclear-grade quality mixed with engineering rigour and configuration control. Construction & Commissioning Nuclear workforce growth becomes most visible and most pressured here. In 2026, what becomes most challenging has more to do with readiness than availability. Projects don’t simply need people who can do the work. They need people who can deliver at pace to nuclear standards, within nuclear governance. Early workforce planning here is what can prevent project bottlenecks later. Construction and commissioning typically demand: High-volume site delivery capability Strong quality culture (inspection, welding, fabrication, assurance) Commissioning expertise aligned to safety and compliance expectations Logistics, HSE leadership, and interface management Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Operations is where nuclear becomes long-term. This is also where nuclear life extension activity becomes a real workforce driver in its own right. Extending the operating life of existing stations relies on retained knowledge and stable capability, and not just recruitment volume. These roles depend on: Reliability and asset performance expertise Maintenance planning and outage delivery Compliance, governance, and leadership maturity Deep site knowledge and consistency Decommissioning & Waste Management Decommissioning is sometimes underweighted in workforce conversations, despite being one of the most sustained drivers of UK nuclear employment. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s (NDA) Draft Business Plan 2026–29 (published December 2025) reinforces decommissioning as a long-duration national programme, with ongoing workforce requirements across dismantling, waste handling, remediation, and programme leadership. This work is often less visible than new builds, but it remains essential to the credibility and delivery of the UK’s wider nuclear programme. Check out our interview with Deep Fission’s CEO, Liz Muller, on rethinking nuclear waste management. The skills shaping nuclear hiring in 2026 Demand in nuclear workforce planning isn’t only about headcount. It’s about the right capability, in the right place, at the right time, delivered to the right nuclear standards. As we move through 2026, pressure remains high in areas such as: Electrical engineering and C&I Systems integration and commissioning Quality, inspection, and assurance Safety case and regulatory-aligned delivery roles Project controls (planning, cost engineering, scheduling) Construction management and interface coordination Digital capability (safety, configuration control, performance) What’s notable in 2026 is that these skills are needed across multiple programme types at once. Across the lifecycle, one theme remains consistent: technical skill matters, but so does the ability to operate inside nuclear governance, with process discipline, documentation quality, and assurance expectations playing a key part of the job. Where nuclear workforce planning breaks down Even with all this nuclear sector growth, one of the biggest friction points is the gap between nuclear talent having the right technical background and being fully ready for nuclear delivery environments. That “missing middle” tends to show up in areas like: Project-readiness and site-readiness Compliance and assurance expectations Safety culture alignment Documentation standards and quality processes Geography adds another layer. Large programmes require both regional workforce development and national mobilisation. Without both, pressure builds quickly in local markets. This is why early workforce activity matters. Early shaping of pipelines leads to early team stabilisation and less reactive delivery, especially when multiple programmes are driving demand simultaneously. This is where an abundance mindset matters most. The constraint isn’t that talent doesn’t exist. It’s that readiness is uneven and pathways into nuclear delivery remain too narrow. When organisations invest early in conversion, onboarding and nuclear-grade standards, capacity expands quickly. When they don’t, scarcity feels permanent. “The challenge in nuclear isn’t a lack of people. It’s that capability is arriving at different levels of readiness, at different times, across different programmes. Workforce planning is about aligning that, not just filling roles.”— James Chamberlain, Nuclear, Sector Director, Rullion What better nuclear workforce planning looks like The most effective workforce strategies in 2026 share a few key traits: Plan by lifecycle phase, not just job titles Nuclear delivery depends on sequencing. Workforce planning needs to follow the demand curve across the lifecycle and not just the current open vacancy list. This forward planning can noticeably start to reduce risk: Clearer lead times Better mobilisation Fewer last-minute compromises on quality or readiness Build structured routes for scarce and transferable capability The sector can’t rely only on nuclear-experienced talent. But “transferable” doesn’t mean instant. Transitions work best when there is clear structure around: Expectations and standards Onboarding and compliance readiness Progression pathways once inside the sector Where skills are transferable but nuclear readiness takes time, Train to Deploy helps build job-ready nuclear talent by combining targeted training with your delivery standards, so people arrive ready to contribute from day one. Invest in early careers with conversion in mind The National Nuclear Strategic Plan for Skills includes commitments to scale early career routes, including the ambition to double apprentices entering the nuclear workforce by academic year 2025/26, with 2,500+ apprentices joining the nuclear workforce in 2024/25. The differentiator is what happens after entry: development pathways, retention, and long-term capability building. Treat workforce as delivery risk management In critical infrastructure, workforce constraints don’t only slow hiring. They affect commissioning timelines, quality performance, and programme confidence. This becomes even more important when the sector is balancing large-scale builds, fleet operations, life extensions, decommissioning delivery, and next-generation programme development such as SMRs. “You can’t separate workforce planning from mobilisation. If screening, onboarding, and readiness aren’t designed for scale, the workforce exists on paper but not on site.” — Jayne Lee, Head of Candidate Services, Rullion What major programmes are signalling in 2026 Sizewell C is a strong example of early workforce momentum, and it sits within a wider landscape that includes major delivery demand at Hinkley Point C and sustained activity across operational and decommissioning sites. In the last month, Sizewell C has reported: Around 2,000 workers onsite More than 100 apprentices appointed Around £3bn in contracts awarded to 400+ UK suppliers Continued regional supply chain mobilisation Early pipeline activity is already shaping workforce readiness, long before peak construction demand. This is the direction the wider market is moving in: earlier engagement, clearer forecasting, and more structured talent strategies across delivery phases. The nuclear hiring landscape in 2026 2026 will continue to be a strong year for the UK nuclear sector, but it will also be a demanding one. The organisations that deliver best will be those that approach nuclear workforce planning as a core part of programme execution: Anticipating scarcity early Building structured pipelines Protecting delivery confidence through quality and readiness Creating workforce models that can scale across multiple sites and phases

By Rullion on 04 February 2026