When Background Screening is Nobody’s Job, Everyone Pays the Price

BLOGBy Rullion on 10 September 2025

As the UK races to hit Net Zero, nuclear and other critical infrastructure sectors are ramping up, and so are screening requirements. If pre‑employment screening lacks a clear owner, confusion, delays, and lost workers quickly follow. Jayne Lee, Head of Candidate Services at Rullion uncovers how this task often gets stuck in the HR admin pile, and why outsourcing early is now a board‑level strategy.

Why Ownership Matters in Screening  

In critical infrastructure industries like nuclear, utilities, and transport, starting a project without the right people cleared for site access is like trying to run a race with your shoelaces tied together. Background screening isn’t just an administrative task. In regulated sectors, it’s a legal and operational requirement that can directly impact your ability to deliver. 

Yet, for many companies, especially those new to regulated work, screening becomes what Jayne Lee, Head of Candidate Services at Rullion, calls a “homeless task.” 

“It gets shuffled between HR and admin, squeezed in around other priorities, and often starts too late. That’s when confusion, bottlenecks and missed deadlines start creeping in.” 

The result? Delays, lost talent, and in some cases, workers walking to competitors who can get them on site faster. 

If you want to keep projects on track, someone must own screening from day one.


 
Why Screening Gets Left Without a Home 

Companies entering regulated sectors for the first time often underestimate the complexity of screening. Jayne sees it often: 

“HR or admin teams end up doing screening on top of their day jobs, with no dedicated vetting team, so it gets passed from pillar to post.” 

With teams already stretched, screening is squeezed in alongside other priorities, often without the right tools, processes, or authority to drive it forward. No one has a complete view of progress, meaning delays go unnoticed until it’s too late. 

This is especially common when screening is a brand-new requirement. For example, a construction firm winning its first contract on a nuclear site.

 

BPSS on Regulated Sites

One client Jayne worked with was contracted to build roundabouts and access roads for a nuclear facility. They were experts in roadworks, but they’d never operated on a regulated site. 

Because the site was controlled by the nuclear regulator, every worker - from site managers to tarmac crews - needed full BPSS (Baseline Personnel Security Standard) clearance before stepping on site. 

BPSS includes: 

  • Right to Work check 

  • Identity verification 

  • Employment reference check (last three years) 

  • DBS check (criminal history record check) 

At first, the client tried to manage it themselves. Reference requests went unanswered for weeks, workers grew impatient, and some left for other suppliers who promised faster starts. Project milestones began to slip. 

With Rullion’s background screening services in place, clearances were completed in days rather than weeks. Communication with workers improved, and the client could focus on delivering the project instead of chasing paperwork. The result? A workforce cleared, compliant, and on site, ready to get the job done.

 

Why This Challenge Is Growing 

The UK’s nuclear industry is expanding rapidly. The government plans to quadruple nuclear capacity by 2050, aiming to generate 24GW, enough to power around a quarter of the country’s electricity needs. This means thousands more workers needing clearance each year. 

And it’s not just nuclear. Energy, utilities, and transport projects are facing similar compliance pressures. With more suppliers feeding into large, multi-year projects, the competition for skilled labour is intense. If your clearance process is slow, you risk losing workers mid-project to faster-moving competitors.

 

The Risks of No Ownership 

When no one owns screening: 

  • Delays multiply – Requests for references or documents sit in inboxes without follow-up. 

  • Workers walk – Contractors move to other suppliers who can clear them faster. 

  • Costs rise – Idle staff, delayed starts, and potential penalties from clients all hit the bottom line. 

  • Reputation suffers – Clients notice when you can’t mobilise on time.

 

Why Outsourcing Early Works 

For companies with constant churn, high contractor volumes, or no dedicated vetting team, outsourcing screening isn’t a “nice-to-have”, it’s a strategic move. 

The benefits include: 

  • Dedicated resource – A team whose sole job is to get people cleared, fast. 

  • Faster turnaround – Rullion averages 7–8 days for BPSS compared to the 30–40 days typical in the market. 

  • Compliance confidence – Every check is completed, documented, and ready for regulator review. 

  • Scalability – Processes that can handle 20 or 2,000 workers with the same consistency. 

  • Worker retention – Keeping candidates engaged through proactive communication. 

You can read more about the impact of slow or incomplete screening in our related article: 5 Pre-Employment Screening Mistakes That Cost You Time, Talent and Trust.

 

Give Screening a Home from Day One 

Whether you outsource or build an internal team, the key is ownership. That means: 

  • Assigning a responsible person or partner before contracts are signed. 

  • Building screening into mobilisation timelines, not starting it after workers are recruited. 

  • Tracking progress in real time so delays can be fixed immediately.

 

Screening as a Competitive Advantage 

In regulated sectors, background screening is more than compliance, it’s a competitive edge. When you make it someone’s job from the start, you keep projects moving, workers engaged, and clients confident in your delivery. 

For high-volume, high-pressure projects, outsourcing to a partner who lives and breathes screening frees your team to focus on what they do best - while ensuring your workforce is cleared, compliant, and ready to go

 


This article is part of the Confessions of a Screening Expert series, where Sibel Akel, Marketing Director at Rullion, speaks with Jayne Lee and other industry leaders about the realities of screening in regulated sectors. 

Share

Unlock your full potential.

Tell us what's holding you back, and we'll design a solution specifically for you

More like this

How to build a business case for changing your MSP provider

How to build a business case for changing your MSP provider

5 signs it’s time to switch MSP providers For leadership, the decision often comes down to proving the return on investment, reducing risk exposure, and ensuring the MSP evolves alongside strategic priorities. Knowing when to make that move isn’t always straightforward, but there are common warning signs that can strengthen your business case: Limited visibility If you can’t access accurate, real-time data on workforce spend, supplier performance, or compliance, you’re operating blind. This makes it harder to control costs, demonstrate ROI, or make strategic decisions. Processes that don’t adapt When workflows remain rigid and fail to keep pace with evolving business needs or regulatory changes, inefficiency creeps in. This often leads to bottlenecks, slower mobilisation, and higher risk exposure. Misalignment with strategy Your MSP provider should act as a partner, not just an administrator. If the programme feels transactional and disconnected from your long-term workforce goals, it weakens your ability to deliver against wider business priorities. Supplier limitations An MSP that relies on a narrow supplier network restricts access to talent. This not only slows down hiring for specialist roles but also prevents you from tapping into under-represented or overlooked talent pools. Lack of innovation If reporting hasn’t improved in years, technology feels outdated, or the provider isn’t pushing continuous improvement, your MSP may be holding you back instead of helping you move forward. The next step is turning these challenges into a structured argument that leadership can’t ignore: your business case. What to include in a business case for switching MSP providers The issues you’ve identified become the evidence, and the improvements you’re aiming for become measurable objectives. By structuring your case around these points, you’ll give stakeholders the confidence that switching MSP providers is a strategic decision, not just a reaction to frustrations. Executive summary Think of this section as the “elevator pitch” for your case. If a senior leader only reads one page, it should answer: Why change now, and what will we gain? Example: Our current MSP model is not providing the visibility, flexibility, or supplier reach we require. By transitioning to a second-generation provider, we can reduce average cost per hire by 15%, cut mobilisation timelines by 20%, and ensure full compliance visibility across our workforce. Current challenges This is where you turn warning signs into hard evidence. Leadership will expect more than anecdotes, so use data to back up your points. The stronger your evidence, the harder it is to ignore. Think rising time-to-hire figures, compliance gaps, or supplier underperformance. Example: Reporting dashboards are limited, preventing us from tracking supplier performance in real time. Average time-to-hire has risen from 28 to 53 days over the past 12 months, delaying project starts. Objectives Objectives show what success looks like after the switch. They should be specific, measurable, and tied directly to organisational priorities. Think of this as the “destination” your business case is leading towards. Example: Reduce time-to-hire for technical roles by 20%. Achieve 100% compliance audit readiness. Introduce real-time workforce reporting by Q2. Options analysis Show leadership that you’ve weighed alternatives fairly. A strong business case doesn’t assume switching is the only option. It shows leadership that every alternative has been considered. Presenting a fair comparison between staying with your current provider and moving to a new one makes your recommendation more credible and balanced. Example: Option 1: stay with current provider Pros: continuity. Cons: persistent issues unresolved. Option 2: switch to new provider Pros: wider supplier network, improved tech, better compliance. Cons: transition costs, short-term disruption (if not managed effectively). Cost-benefit analysis Demonstrate how switching creates measurable financial and strategic gains. This could be savings on cost per hire, avoided compliance penalties, or improved project delivery that translates directly into revenue. Example: Based on current hiring volumes, a reduction of £1,500 per hire equates to £225,000 in annual savings. Avoided compliance fines (based on previous breaches) estimated at £50,000 annually. Implementation plan Even the best business case will raise the question, “How will we manage the transition?” Your implementation plan reassures stakeholders by showing how risks will be controlled and disruption minimised. Break the plan into phases and set realistic timeframes. Example: Phase 1: shadow mode (Months 1–2). Phase 2: 50% requisitions managed by new MSP (Months 2-3). Phase 3: full handover (Months 4–6). KPIs and success measures Defining KPIs upfront makes your business case measurable and accountable. This section shows how success will be tracked after implementation. Clear measures help leadership see the long-term value of change. Example: Reduce average time-to-hire from 48 to 38 days within 6 months. Achieve 95% supplier compliance with the agreed SLA by Q3. Deliver full visibility of workforce spend by year-end. Demonstrating ROI: cost vs value Boards rarely approve a switch without seeing hard numbers. To win them over, your business case must prove that the value of change outweighs the cost of disruption. A simple three-step ROI model makes this clear: the cost of staying put, the cost of switching, and the value gained. Each step should be backed up with data and, where possible, linked to strategic business goals. 1. Cost of staying put (Average cost per hire × annual hires) Compliance breaches, project delays, supplier mark-ups 2. Cost of switching MSP providers Transition fees, internal resource time, short-term disruption 3. Value gained Savings from lower mark-ups Reduced compliance risk Faster mobilisation and delivery Stronger supplier performance Example: Our NWG MSP partnership: In 2025, NWG required mobilisation of Information Services (IS), data, cybersecurity, and change management roles with a 4-week deadline (over Christmas) to support their digital transformation. 100% of contractors were transitioned on time, despite a condensed four-week window and minimal legacy data. Effective contingent workforce management with zero disruption to services, preserving business continuity across mission-critical information systems projects during a peak period for infrastructure planning. £15,000+ saved in the first month alone through improved fulfilment routes and transparent rate control. This example illustrates how value can be realised quickly. And, when combined with the ROI framework above, it helps build a case that is both credible and compelling. Managing risks during the transition Even with a strong business case, leaders will ask, “What’s the risk?” Anticipating these concerns will make your case more persuasive. For more guidance, our MSP Implementation Question Checklist highlights the questions you should ask during mobilisation to ensure your programme is set up for success. Operational disruption – delays in hiring or mobilisation. The mitigation for this would be a phased transition, a parallel run for 1–2 months before full handover. Supplier resistance – Preferred suppliers may hesitate to engage. Early communication, clear SLAs, onboarding support Knowledge transfer gaps - Knowledge transfer gaps. Structured handover between outgoing and incoming MSP Compliance lapses – Risk of exposure during transition. Align compliance checks with new provider from Day 1 Securing stakeholder buy-in Different stakeholders view value differently. Map their concerns to your business case: Finance/Board: ROI, predictable spend. Show annual savings, break-even point, and long-term value HR/Operations: Talent access, time-to-hire. Evidence of a wider supplier network and faster fills Compliance: Audit readiness, risk management. Highlight improved governance and real-time visibility Procurement: Supplier performance, cost control, contractual efficiency. Demonstrate stronger supplier management, better rates, and transparent reporting Project Managers: Mobilisation speed. Show reduced delays and faster project delivery The long-term benefits of a 2nd Gen MSP Your business case should end by showing how a second-generation MSP provider sets the organisation up for future success: Real-time data for strategic workforce planning Stronger governance in highly regulated environments Access to broader supplier networks, including overlooked and under-represented talent pools Faster project mobilisation, reducing time to value Continuous improvement, not stagnation This shifts the decision from a short-term fix to a long-term strategic investment. A well-structured business case turns the idea of switching MSPs from a reactive decision into a justified, proactive strategy. It helps provide the confidence that your next MSP partnership will deliver greater value. And when you reach the point of preparing for mobilisation, our MSP Implementation Checklist is a practical tool to help you ask the right questions and ensure your new programme is set up for long-term success.

By Rullion on 30 September 2025

BPSS Clearance: A Smarter Approach to Background Screening

BPSS Clearance: A Smarter Approach to Background Screening

“What exactly is BPSS clearance, and why is it such a big deal for places like Hinkley Point C or Sizewell C?” Sibel asked at the start of our latest Confessions of a Screening Expert conversation. It’s a good question. For many businesses stepping into regulated environments for the first time, Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) checks can feel like a maze of acronyms and requirements. But for Jayne Lee, Candidate Services at Rullion, BPSS is the baseline that keeps projects moving, and people safe. What BPSS Clearance Involves BPSS is the government framework for initial background screening. Jayne describes it as “the baseline of where people need to be cleared to.” It includes: Right to Work check Identity verification Criminal record check (DBS checks) Three years of employment referencing “People sometimes call it the ‘RICE’ model,” Jayne adds. “Right to Work, Identity, Criminal record, and Employment history. It’s a clear structure, and it’s widely recognised as the entry-level clearance for high-security roles.” From there, some roles may require higher levels of clearance (like SC or DV), but BPSS is always the starting point. And while it’s critical at nuclear sites like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, BPSS clearance is increasingly required across other regulated sectors too, including rail, energy, and utilities. The Challenge: Speed Without Compromise At projects like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, every worker - from engineers to ground staff - must hold valid BPSS clearance before stepping on site. Delays here can stall entire workstreams. The industry norm for completing BPSS checks is often 30–40 days. For major infrastructure projects, that’s simply not sustainable. Rullion’s solution: Jayne’s team achieves an average of 7.5 days per clearance. In exceptional cases, they’ve turned around a check in just 24-hours. But it’s not just about speed for speed’s sake. “When you scale up, challenges appear,” Jayne explains. “Last summer we onboarded over 1,000 international workers in one intake. International criminal record checks can push timelines out, but even then, our average was around 15 days — still significantly faster than sector norms.” Read how we deliver screening success at Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C › and see how our approach to BPSS clearance is keeping projects on track while reducing delays across complex supply chains. More Than a System: People First 'Where does this speed come from?' asks Sibel. According to Jayne, it’s the human-led approach that makes the real difference. Before any link or form is sent, every candidate receives a call from a named advisor. “That first call is golden,” says Jayne. “We introduce ourselves, explain the process step by step, and make sure candidates know what documents they’ll need. If they’ve got everything ready, the process sails through.” This proactive support avoids delays caused by missing documents or incomplete forms. And it doesn’t end there: Candidates have a direct phone number and email for their advisor. Clients get weekly catch-up calls to resolve issues quickly. No one is left waiting on a generic helpdesk or traffic-light status update. “It’s not just about compliance,” Jayne adds. “It’s about building trust and momentum.” Where Technology Fits In It’s not all down to people. Smart technology underpins the process, helping keep everything secure, visible, and moving at pace. For candidates, that means a smoother journey with less waiting around. For clients, it means instant oversight of their workforce, so they know exactly where things stand. “It’s the combination that works,” Jayne explains. “Automation helps with speed, but human oversight ensures accuracy, engagement, and problem-solving along the way.” Common Challenges, Clear Solutions Every project has its hurdles. This approach balances governance, compliance, and candidate experience all without sacrificing speed. Jayne outlines a few common ones, and how her team resolves them: Challenge Solution Candidates are slow to provide documents. Early preparation calls mean candidates know exactly what to have ready. International workers require overseas checks. Dedicated advisors manage timelines and keep clients informed, so expectations are clear. Clients worry about visibility. The portal and weekly calls ensure full transparency at every stage. Final Word from the Screening Expert Jayne has spent over 13 years in background screening. Her verdict? “BPSS clearance isn’t just a box to tick. Done right, it’s what keeps projects moving and candidates engaged. It’s about being quick, yes - but also accurate, compliant, and supportive. That’s where the human element really matters.” For organisations, the key takeaway is clear: background screening services are most effective when they combine smart technology with a human touch. This article is part of the Confessions of a Screening Expert series, where Sibel Akel, Marketing Director at Rullion, speaks with Jayne Lee and other industry leaders about the realities of screening in regulated sectors.

By Rullion on 25 September 2025

NEWS
Rullion receives 'Highly Commended' at the 2025 APSCo OutSource Awards for Excellence

Rullion receives 'Highly Commended' at the 2025 APSCo OutSource Awards for Excellence

This recognition reflects the strength of our Managed Service Programme (MSP) delivery and our long-standing partnerships with clients such as E.ON, Siemens and Northumbrian Water. These are complex, regulated environments where trust, compliance and responsiveness are critical – and where our recruitment outsourcing solutions are making a measurable difference. Why the APSCo Awards Matter APSCo’s OutSource Awards for Excellence are highly respected in the staffing industry, celebrating organisations that deliver innovative, compliant and scalable workforce solutions. Recognition from APSCo highlights the value of strategic MSP services in a market where organisations face skills shortages, tighter regulation and growing reliance on contingent workforces to keep operations running. Lindsay Harrison, Chief Customer Officer at Rullion, said: “Judges recognised Rullion for its ability to deliver recruitment outsourcing programmes that combine scale, compliance, and exceptional service. With a 90% client retention rate and partnerships spanning decades, Rullion has proven its ability to build long-term trust with organisations across critical infrastructure.” We’re grateful to APSCo and the judging panel for this recognition and extend our congratulations to the winners. We’re proud to be part of a community that celebrates excellence in recruitment outsourcing. What the Judges Said Lindsay Harrison, Chief Customer Officer at Rullion, said: In their announcement, APSCo shared: “Judges recognised Rullion for its ability to deliver recruitment outsourcing programmes that combine scale, compliance, and exceptional service. With a 90% client retention rate and partnerships spanning decades, Rullion has proven its ability to build long-term trust with organisations across critical infrastructure.” They also praised our NPS of 93, innovative direct sourcing strategies, and ability to manage complex transitions without disruption. Clients consistently describe Rullion as a true extension of their teams. A Proven MSP Model Our Managed Service Programme is built to handle the challenges of contingent workforce management at scale. Whether it’s sourcing highly skilled engineers for the energy sector, managing compliance for regulated utility environments, or ensuring rapid deployment of contractors across infrastructure projects, our MSP model gives clients the confidence that every aspect of workforce delivery is covered. We’ve invested in direct sourcing to improve quality, reduce time-to-hire and deliver cost savings. At E.ON, for example, we achieved 100% direct hires, cut time-to-hire by 15%, and improved interview-to-offer conversion rates by 25%. People-First, Insight-Led Delivery Our success isn’t only about processes and metrics. It comes from a people-first approach that prioritises partnership, communication and cultural alignment. We know that managing a contingent workforce is not just about filling vacancies, it’s about creating a seamless experience for hiring managers, contractors and stakeholders. We support this with an insight-led model that measures five key areas: compliance, cost savings, operational excellence, innovation, and social value. This allows us to track impact and continuously improve our MSP delivery. Alongside business results, we embed ESG principles into our programmes, from inclusive recruitment practices to supporting local supply chains and delivering social value in the communities we serve. Looking Ahead The demand for agile and resilient workforce models is only increasing. Organisations across energy, utilities, and infrastructure face rising pressure to balance compliance with innovation while securing scarce skills. As an MSP service provider, we’re committed to helping clients adapt, scale effectively, and unlock long-term value from their contingent workforce. Winning this recognition at the APSCo OutSource Awards highlights the ongoing commitment of our teams to deliver MSP solutions that make a measurable difference for clients. For us, this commendation is about more than a single programme. It reflects the day-to-day commitment of our people to deliver people-first, insight-led MSP solutions that evolve with our clients' needs.

By Rullion on 19 September 2025